• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
Celebrating our 1,000th edition. The climate news you need
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  FEATURED
BREAKING: No Public Finance for East Coast LNG Projects, Wilkinson Says July 4, 2022
‘Climate Math Gets Harder’ as Radicalized Supreme Court Upends U.S. Carbon Regulation July 4, 2022
Dire Living Conditions, Climate-Driven Heat Wave Produce Deadliest Human Smuggling Event in U.S. History July 4, 2022
Ex-Fossil Workers Convert Old Oilfields to Solar Farms After ‘Rapid Upskilling’ in Alberta June 29, 2022
London Becomes Biggest City to Sign Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty June 29, 2022
Next
Prev
Home Climate Impacts & Adaptation

UN Climate Fund Operating ‘Like a Car Without a Dashboard’

October 15, 2017
Reading time: 3 minutes

UNclimatechange/Flickr

UNclimatechange/Flickr

 

The United Nations Green Climate Fund (GCF) is functioning like a car without a dashboard, with only a tiny fraction of its approved funding actually disbursed and a growing queue of applicants awaiting accreditation to receive funds.

That’s the conclusion that Ian Callaghan of NDCi.Global reaches in a recent blog post, after observing the GCF’s latest board of directors meeting.

The meeting in Cairo approved 11 new proposals, bringing the fund’s total to 54 projects worth US$2.6 billion. “Actual disbursement, however, remains at a fraction of this sum—$88 million for mitigation, adaptation, and private sector projects by the end of September 2017, and a further $10 million for readiness projects, so less than $100 million in all,” Callaghan writes.

“Given that the first projects were agreed two years ago now, the fact that only 3.8% of the funds approved have actually been disbursed is surely an astonishing and disturbing number,” he adds. “Certainly, a commercial operation disbursing at such a rate would have lost all its customers and gone bust long ago.”

Key factors in the GCF’s sluggish performance include the 250 conditions attached to the 43 projects the directors previously approved, and the “escalating backlog” of 92 entities seeking accreditation as GCF recipients—meaning that some applicants might wait five years for approval. “To outsiders, [the accreditation system] seems an impossibly bureaucratic process and one that is very difficult to navigate, and we do know of private sector entities that have significant expertise in developing countries that are not applying for accreditation” or responding to requests for proposals, one private sector observer told the board meeting.

Callaghan proposes an “efficiency dashboard” to monitor the GCF’s projects, with performance indicators that include the number and value of projects approved, funds disbursed, projected time to full disbursal, and tracking of project conditions set, met, and unmet.

In his post, Callaghan welcomes the GCF’s accreditation of five new “direct access entities” (DAEs) as funding conduits for local projects, but notes that five big, international institutions still manage nearly three-quarters of the Fund’s money. “It’s good to see that DAEs are now in the majority, but international entities are still getting all the money,” said one civil society observer. “GCF is at risk of becoming a funding source mainly for large development banks and other multilateral institutions.”

Earlier this year, in a post that followed the GCF’s spring board meeting, Callaghan argued that the Fund was due for a paradigm shift. At that session, a drought adaptation program proposed by Ethiopia became the flashpoint for disagreement between board members from developed countries on one side, developing countries and civil society observers on the other. The project was ultimately turned down.

“The debate cast light not just on this divide, but also on some gaps in the policies and procedures of the Board which—given that this was after all its 16th and not its first or sixth meeting—were disturbingly cavernous,” Callaghan wrote at the time.

“Given that it is a mechanism of the UNFCCC and the product—as one Board member pointed out—of a negotiation among climate experts rather than a strategy or vision of financiers, a politicized structure may have been an inevitability early in its life,” he added. “But seven years on from its formation, this structure is surely now due for some radical reform,” based on established funds that handle several times the $100 billion per year the GCF eventually hopes to administer.

A key structural problem, he said, is a division of responsibilities that gives the GCF secretariat no authority to turn down substandard projects as long as they “tick all the boxes” to meet the administrative requirements for submitting a proposal.

“The result of this is that projects with clear deficiencies come forward, and in almost all cases are approved, but with lengthy conditions attached by the Board in an effort to correct or mitigate the perceived deficiencies,” Callaghan wrote. “Conditions (or covenants) can be a useful tool, but they should be there to promote good behaviour or prevent bad behaviour, not to compensate for basic flaws in project design.”



in Climate Impacts & Adaptation, Community Climate Finance, COP Conferences, Environmental Justice, International Agencies & Studies

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Wikimedia Commons
Oil & Gas

BREAKING: No Public Finance for East Coast LNG Projects, Wilkinson Says

July 4, 2022
123
angela n./flickr
United States

‘Climate Math Gets Harder’ as Radicalized Supreme Court Upends U.S. Carbon Regulation

July 4, 2022
122
EdmondMeinfelder/flickr
Environmental Justice

Dire Living Conditions, Climate-Driven Heat Wave Produce Deadliest Human Smuggling Event in U.S. History

July 4, 2022
35

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

angela n./flickr

‘Climate Math Gets Harder’ as Radicalized Supreme Court Upends U.S. Carbon Regulation

July 4, 2022
122
Wikimedia Commons

BREAKING: No Public Finance for East Coast LNG Projects, Wilkinson Says

July 4, 2022
123
U.S. Navy/picryl

Montreal to Host New NATO Climate Centre as Military Analyst Confronts Global ‘Hyperthreat’

July 4, 2022
81
opinion polling gender green recovery climate action

Conservative Women Far More Likely Than Men to Support Green Transition, EcoAnalytics Research Finds

July 4, 2022
80
Maurits90/Wikimedia Commons

San Francisco Commuter Train Derailed by Scorching Track Temperatures, Extreme Heat

July 4, 2022
49
EdmondMeinfelder/flickr

Dire Living Conditions, Climate-Driven Heat Wave Produce Deadliest Human Smuggling Event in U.S. History

July 4, 2022
35

Recent Posts

Adrian Grycuk/Wikimedia Commons

Youth Climate Case Moves to Top Tribunal in European Court

July 4, 2022
34
Seci/wikimedia commons

Saudi Aramco Talks Net-Zero, Plans to Boost Production Through 2035

July 4, 2022
21
Keith Weller/Wikimedia Commons

U.S. Methane Plan Gives Big Ag a Free Pass

July 4, 2022
28
Fadi Hage/wikimedia commons

Indoor Farming Revolution Comes with Significant Carbon Cost

July 4, 2022
37
Mont SUTTON snow terrain

Southern Quebec Towns Scramble for Solutions as Water Sources Dwindle

July 4, 2022
37
Pxhere

Marine Stewardship Figures Prominently in Latest Project Drawdown List

July 4, 2022
24
Next Post
Tennen-Gas/Wikimedia Commons

Electric Car Tipping Point Could Slash Oil Demand by 2025

The Energy Mix

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}