• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
BP Predicts Faster Oil and Gas Decline as Clean Energy Spending Hits $1.1T in 2022 January 31, 2023
Canada Needs Oil and Gas Emissions Cap to Hit 2030 Goal: NZAB January 31, 2023
Ecuador’s Amazon Drilling Plan Shows Need for Fossil Non-Proliferation Treaty January 31, 2023
Rainforest Carbon Credits from World’s Biggest Provider are ‘Largely Worthless’, Investigation Finds January 31, 2023
Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing January 23, 2023
Next
Prev

Key Component of Darlington Rebuild Could Run $375 Million Over Budget

October 15, 2017
Reading time: 2 minutes

Nuclear Regulatory Commission/Flickr

Nuclear Regulatory Commission/Flickr

 

A single component of the C$12.8-billion Darlington nuclear refurbishment project has ballooned in cost from $108 million to as much as $500 million, and external auditors now say those costs were “poorly characterized” as part of a “deliberate management strategy” by Ontario Power Generation to keep contractors’ bid prices low, Global News reports.

OPG “told contractors to ignore potential risks and enter artificially low cost estimates for work,” the TV network alleges, citing documents that include a May 2014 report by auditors Burns & McDonnell-Modus. “According to the report, contractors were told to remove potential risks from their bids, despite OPG knowing some of these risks would likely occur.”

  • The climate news you need. Subscribe now to our engaging new weekly digest.
  • You’ll receive exclusive, never-before-seen-content, distilled and delivered to your inbox every weekend.
  • The Weekender: Succinct, solutions-focused, and designed with the discerning reader in mind.
New!
Subscribe

Those costs included the risk—and, as it turned out, the reality—of soil contamination around the Heavy Water Storage and Drum Handling Facility, a network of tanks and pipes that filters radioactive water. “While OPG agrees current cost estimates for the project are significantly higher than originally budgeted—with no guarantee current cost estimates will remain intact—they insist all amounts, including those for risks, were included in the final estimate released to the public,” Global reports.

The audit report attributes the cost minimization strategy to a former vice president of OPG’s projects and modifications (P&M) division. It also concludes that OPG’s choice of contractor for the project put cost over qualifications.

“P&M gave only token consideration to determining which contractor had a better approach for executing the work,” the report stated. OPG “chose the ‘low bidder’ even though the other contractor’s qualifications and project approach were viewed more favourably.”

While the provincial agency subsequently took “aggressive action to correct as many of the major issues as possible”, the auditors concluded, the financial damage “to a certain extent cannot be fully mitigated. The affected [projects] will cost more, finish later, and pose a much greater threat to refurbishment than management initially realized.”

The audit report traces a change in contractors and delayed schedule for the heavy water facility, as well as a June 2016 internal audit in which OPG apparently found significant delays. “Work completion was averaging less than 50% of the work scheduled compared to a target of 90%,” that report stated. By March 2017, Burns & McDonnell-Modus was concerned that the persistent problems were having an impact on the refurbishment project as a whole.

“These projects continue to drain resources from refurbishment,” the auditors reported. “There are trends observed in the vendors’ management of those projects and other past projects that must be eradicated.”

They added that the project as a whole was 19% complete in February, compared to a target of 23.4%, and work had fallen behind by 123,876 hours.

OPG spokesperson Neal Kelly maintained that “the $12.8-billion budget is based on a high-confidence schedule. Our public commitment hasn’t changed, and the project is tracking on time and on budget.” He added that OPG “has a more aggressive working schedule that we challenge ourselves and our contractors to achieve.”



in Energy / Carbon Pricing & Economics

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Ken Teegardin www.SeniorLiving.Org/flickr
Clean Electricity Grid

Virtual Power Plants Hit an ‘Inflection Point’

January 31, 2023
125
EcoAnalytics
Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion

Albertans Want a Just Transition, Despite Premier’s Grumbling

January 23, 2023
325
Climate Denial & Greenwashing

Exxon Had the Right Global Warming Numbers Through Decades of Denial: Study

January 17, 2023
229

Comments 1

  1. jillian lennox says:
    5 years ago

    It’s truly shocking to think we, the tax-payers, are getting stuck with such a huge debt for something that will inevitably fall on our children and their children’s shoulders as well as the fatally toxic waste which they will also receive. It isn’t a future any of us asked for or want for ourselves or our children. We weren’t even warned and have lived through one disaster after another which we didn’t plan for. How can we do this to a country that has been protected by aboriginal people for over 5 centuries. This is complete insanity. Most of our provinces are moving towards renewable energy and we have the luxury of living right next door to Quebec whose hydro electricity already provides for parts of Eastern Ontario, including Quebec, and New York. Energy for correct will be cheap, safe, and clean and our own willingness to work towards conservation could soon make us the beautiful province it was when our ancestors arrived here.
    Radiated air and radiation pollution isn’t something we want or deserve to live with.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Mike Mozart/Flickr

BP Predicts Faster Oil and Gas Decline as Clean Energy Spending Hits $1.1T in 2022

February 4, 2023
331
openthegovernment.org

BREAKING: U.S. Senate Passes Historic $369B Climate Package

August 8, 2022
541
Sam Balto/YouTube

Elementary School’s Bike Bus Brings ‘Sheer Joy’ to Portland Neighbourhood

February 5, 2023
261
Lucio Santos/flickr

Canadian Banks Increased Fossil Investment in 2021, Report Card Shows

November 27, 2022
116

Recent Posts

Gina Dittmer/PublicDomainPictures

Canada Needs Oil and Gas Emissions Cap to Hit 2030 Goal: NZAB

January 31, 2023
196
CONFENIAE

Ecuador’s Amazon Drilling Plan Shows Need for Fossil Non-Proliferation Treaty

January 31, 2023
61
Ken Teegardin www.SeniorLiving.Org/flickr

Virtual Power Plants Hit an ‘Inflection Point’

January 31, 2023
125
/snappy goat

Rainforest Carbon Credits from World’s Biggest Provider are ‘Largely Worthless’, Investigation Finds

January 31, 2023
94
Victorgrigas/wikimedia commons

World Bank Climate Reforms Too ‘Timid and Slow,’ Critics Warn

January 31, 2023
42
Doc Searls/Twitter

Guilbeault Could Intervene on Ontario Greenbelt Development

January 31, 2023
132
Next Post

UN: ignore Trump on climate

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}