• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
Celebrating our 1,000th edition. The climate news you need
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  FEATURED
Soaring Fertilizer Prices Could Deliver ‘Silver Lining’ For Emissions, But Farmers Struggle to Limit Use June 26, 2022
BREAKING: UN Nature Summit, the ‘Paris Conference for Biodiversity’, Moves to Montreal in December June 19, 2022
‘LET’S SUE BIG OIL’: Legal Team Launches Class Action Campaign for B.C. Municipalities June 17, 2022
‘It Could Have Been Any of Us’, Colleague Says, After Brazil Confirms Murders of Bruno Pereira, Dom Phillips June 17, 2022
Infrastructure Gap a ‘Life and Death’ Matter as Northern Canada Warms June 17, 2022
Next
Prev
Home Jurisdictions Canada

Nearly Half of Canadians Think Science Behind Global Warming is ‘Unclear’

September 22, 2017
Reading time: 2 minutes

bones64/Pixabay

bones64/Pixabay

 

Nearly half of Canadians wrongly believe the science on climate change is still “unclear”, and the proportion has increased by nearly 20% in the last year, according to a poll conducted in mid-August by Léger Marketing.

In the poll, released this week by the Ontario Science Centre to mark Science Literacy Week, 47% agreed that “the science behind global warming is still unclear,” up from 40% in 2016.

“I think these are worrisome results,” said Science Centre CEO Maurice Bitran. “If you think that climate change is one of the main issues that we face as a society, and almost half of us think that the science is still unclear when there’s a pretty broad scientific consensus about it, this affects the chances that we have to act in a unified way about it.”

Bitran said the four in 10 respondents who see science as a matter of opinion showed “a lack of understanding of the scientific method.”

Other findings in the poll “suggest a lack of trust in science and media coverage of scientific issues,” CBC reports: 68% believe science is “reported selectively to support news media objectives”; 59% think media present scientific issues “to support a political position”; and 31% agree that “because scientific ideas are fluid and subject to change, they can’t be trusted”.

Dawn Sutherland, Canada Research Chair in Science Education in Cultural Contexts at the University of Winnipeg, said the survey design may have driven the apparently extreme results, and pointed to some positive numbers coming out of the survey: 82% of respondents said they “would like to know more about science and how it affects our world”, while 79% said they were comfortable “knowing that scientific answers may not be definitive”.

University of Ottawa science communication researcher Kelly Bronson faulted media for trying too hard to find both sides in stories where the science clearly points in one direction. “It doesn’t help the public learn how to distinguish true knowledge from mere opinion if both are given equal weight in a news story,” she told CBC. She noted that some would-be opinion-makers “actively try to use a certain degree of legitimate scientific uncertainty” to spread misinformation and mistrust of science.



in Canada, Climate Denial & Greenwashing, Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

pxhere
Environmental Justice

Environmental Racism Bill Passes Second Reading in House of Commons

June 26, 2022
1
Graco/Facebook
Food Security

Soaring Fertilizer Prices Could Deliver ‘Silver Lining’ For Emissions, But Farmers Struggle to Limit Use

June 26, 2022
2
Konrad Summers/Kern West Oil Museum via Wikimedia Commons
Oil & Gas

Imperial Oil Backs Lithium Recovery Project in Alberta’s Leduc Oilfield

June 26, 2022
1

Comments 5

  1. Robert Richardson says:
    5 years ago

    You can’t just keep dumbing everything down!

    Reply
  2. John Hunter says:
    5 years ago

    Perhaps it shown the public is more astute than the media think?

    Reply
    • Mitchell Beer says:
      5 years ago

      Well, our bet would be 53% as astute as you say, 15-20% possibly thrown off by a poorly-phrased question, and the rest taken in by climate misinformation, giving fossil companies a return on their multi-year investment in climate denial.

      Reply
  3. John Hunter says:
    5 years ago

    Mitchell so the well paid environmental lobby (mostly by US foundations who ignore the USA having doubled its crude production in the last decade) can be trusted 100%?

    Reply
    • Mitchell Beer says:
      5 years ago

      I’m not sure how your comment relates to a story on Canadian public opinion. But to answer the question, I suppose, you’d have to identify someone who’s a part of the “well-paid environmental lobby”. I haven’t found them yet. If I did, though, I suspect I would trust them rather more than the well-paid fossil lobby that has succeeded in negotiating subsidies that exceed $10 million per minute world-wide (http://theenergymix.com/2015/05/20/10-million-per-minute-imf-recalculates-fossil-fuel-subsidies/), propping up a product that produces severe weather, sea level rise, and regional instability when used as directed.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

The federal government's Cliff Street Power Plant is at the centre of Ottawa's plans to reduce natural gas demand. Photo: PWGSC

EXCLUSIVE: Ontario Regulator Refuses New Pipeline, Tells Enbridge to Plan for Lower Gas Demand

May 30, 2022
5.2k
Jason Woodhead/Flickr

Trans Mountain Pipeline On Track to Lose $600 Million, Parliamentary Budget Officer Finds

June 24, 2022
341
Ben_Kerckx/Pixabay

Plastics Cited as ‘Fossil Industry’s Plan B’ as Guilbeault Announces Partial Ban

June 24, 2022
219
Bruce Reeve/Flickr

Opinion: Ontario’s New ‘Carbon Tax’ Looks Like the One Doug Ford Fought

June 7, 2022
1.6k
eloialferez66/pixnio

Toronto’s New Backyard Homes Will Help Fight Sprawl

June 24, 2022
70
Greg Goebel/Wikimedia Commons

Canadian Pension Board Invests $141M in Chinese Coal Projects, Undercutting Federal Phaseout Policy

July 29, 2020
2.3k

Recent Posts

David/flickr

U.S. Supreme Court Expected to Gut Emission Controls as Climate Scientists Petition for Plan B

June 26, 2022
1
pxhere

Environmental Racism Bill Passes Second Reading in House of Commons

June 26, 2022
1
Graco/Facebook

Soaring Fertilizer Prices Could Deliver ‘Silver Lining’ For Emissions, But Farmers Struggle to Limit Use

June 26, 2022
2
stockvault

Animal Agriculture Could Reduce Future Pandemic Risk, UK Researchers Say

June 26, 2022
1
Gustavo Petro Urrego/flickr

Colombia’s President-Elect Has ‘Ambitious’ Plans to Halt Amazon Deforestation

June 26, 2022
1
Adam E. Moreira/wikimedia commons

Suspend Transit Fares, Not Gas Tax, Climate Advocates Urge Biden

June 26, 2022
1
Next Post
Bales of straw on a farm in Sweden. Image: Olof Senestam via Flickr

Biogas from waste can oust fossil fuels

The Energy Mix

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}