• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing January 23, 2023
Extreme Warming Ahead Even as Worst-Case Scenarios Grow ‘Obsolete’ January 23, 2023
Notley Scorches Federal Just Transition Bill as Fossil CEO Calls for Oilsands Boom January 23, 2023
IRON OXIDE: New Battery Brings Long-Duration Storage to Grids, 750 Jobs to West Virginia January 23, 2023
BREAKING: GFANZ Banks, Investors Pour Hundreds of Billions into Fossil Fuels January 17, 2023
Next
Prev

Civilian Nuclear Emerges as Essential Supply Chain for U.S., UK Military

September 5, 2017
Reading time: 2 minutes

 

The civilian nuclear industry is a cornerstone of the United States nuclear weapons establishment—and that kind of connection might also explain why the United Kingdom decided to continue its nuclear program after critiquing its cost.

“The link between the civil nuclear industry and the military’s ability to maintain its nuclear weapons capability is spelt out in a report by experts close to the Pentagon,” Climate News Network reports, citing the Washington, DC-based Energy Futures Initiative. “It states openly that tritium, an essential component of nuclear weapons, is manufactured in civilian reactors for military use. It also says that civilian reactors are needed to produce highly enriched uranium.”

  • The climate news you need. Subscribe now to our engaging new weekly digest.
  • You’ll receive exclusive, never-before-seen-content, distilled and delivered to your inbox every weekend.
  • The Weekender: Succinct, solutions-focused, and designed with the discerning reader in mind.
New!
Subscribe

The report predicts that Russia and China, with new civilian nuclear stations on the way, “will overtake America both in influence and ability to deliver a nuclear threat unless steps are taken to prop up the civil nuclear program at home.”

Governments, particularly the UK, have long maintained there was no connection between their civilian and military nuclear activities, notes correspondent Paul Brown. “This is the first time that the dependence of nuclear weapons states on their civil nuclear programs has been so clearly spelt out.”

“A strong domestic supply chain is needed to provide for nuclear Navy requirements,” the EFI report states. “This supply chain has an inherent and very strong overlap with the commercial nuclear energy sector,” and “includes a work force trained in science and engineering, [consisting] of U.S. citizens who qualify for security clearances.”

Moreover, with no current supply chain for the highly-enriched uranium the navy will need, “the relatively lengthy time period required to stand up such a capability raises serious, near-term concerns about the U.S. capacity to meet this critical national security need,” the report warns. And while the civilian nuclear industry is losing out in efforts to attract the next-generation work force, the report acknowledges that a career in military nuclear “might prove even less attractive to the younger generation,” Brown writes. “It fears there would not be enough qualified American people with security clearance to support the military.”

Climate News Net connects the U.S. report back to a curious moment in 2005, when the UK inexplicably announced a revival of its domestic nuclear industry. In 2002, the government’s Performance and Innovation Unit had concluded that, even then, nuclear cost too much, and renewable energy was a better option for generating electricity.

Tony Blair’s government rejected that advice after a “secretive review,” Brown recalls, and initiated an “unprecedented intensification in efforts to preserve nuclear skills for the military sector. Many millions of pounds have been given in government grants since that time to set up nuclear training programs.”



in Clean Electricity Grid, Climate News Network, General Renewables, Nuclear, UK & Europe, United States

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

RL0919/wikimedia commons
Finance & Investment

Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing

January 23, 2023
1.9k
Weirton, WV by Jon Dawson/flickr
Clean Electricity Grid

IRON OXIDE: New Battery Brings Long-Duration Storage to Grids, 750 Jobs to West Virginia

January 23, 2023
445
hangela/pixabay
Coal

New UK Coal Mine Faces Two Legal Challenges

January 24, 2023
38

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

RL0919/wikimedia commons

Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing

January 23, 2023
1.9k
Weirton, WV by Jon Dawson/flickr

IRON OXIDE: New Battery Brings Long-Duration Storage to Grids, 750 Jobs to West Virginia

January 23, 2023
445
Kenuoene/pixabay

$50B Opportunity Means ‘Go Time’ for Canadian Renewables: CanREA CEO

December 19, 2022
541
EcoAnalytics

Albertans Want a Just Transition, Despite Premier’s Grumbling

January 23, 2023
168
Rachel Notley/Facebook

Notley Scorches Federal Just Transition Bill as Fossil CEO Calls for Oilsands Boom

January 23, 2023
221
@tongbingxue/Twitter

Extreme Warming Ahead Even as Worst-Case Scenarios Grow ‘Obsolete’

January 23, 2023
227

Recent Posts

Sergio Boscaino/flickr

Dubai Mulls Quitting C40 Cities Over ‘Costly’ Climate Target

January 24, 2023
75
hangela/pixabay

New UK Coal Mine Faces Two Legal Challenges

January 24, 2023
38

Gas Stoves Enter U.S. Climate Culture War, Become ‘Bellwether’ for Industry

January 22, 2023
69
Jeff Hitchcock/flickr.

BREAKING: GFANZ Banks, Investors Pour Hundreds of Billions into Fossil Fuels

January 23, 2023
486

Exxon Had the Right Global Warming Numbers Through Decades of Denial: Study

January 17, 2023
221
willenhallwench / Pixabay

Ontario Greenwashes with ‘Misleading, Illegitimate’ Emission Credits

January 16, 2023
305
Next Post
Marcusroos/Wikimedia Commons

Fossil Economy Becomes Central Issue in Norwegian Election

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}