• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
Repsol Abandons Plan to Ship Canadian LNG to Europe March 17, 2023
Biden Approves $8B Oil Extraction Plan in Ecologically Sensitive Alaska March 14, 2023
U.S. Solar Developers Scramble after Silicon Valley Bank Collapse March 14, 2023
$30.9B Price Tag Makes Trans Mountain Pipeline a ‘Catastrophic Boondoggle’ March 14, 2023
UN Buys Tanker, But Funding Gap Could Scuttle Plan to Salvage Oil from ‘Floating Time Bomb’ March 9, 2023
Next
Prev

Trump’s ‘Clean’ Coal Boast Leaves Observers Baffled

August 24, 2017
Reading time: 3 minutes

Giphy/Facebook

Giphy/Facebook

 

After months of touting his affinity for so-called “clean” coal, Donald Trump left observers wondering whether he really understands the concept, after he name-checked the technology during a rambling speech to a campaign-style rally in Phoenix earlier this week.

The apparent gaffe prompted a mini-revival for one of the most frequent memes from the popular children’s film, The Princess Bride. “You keep using that word,” one of the characters says to another, in one of the more memorable moments in the story. “I do not think it means what you think it means.”

  • Concise headlines. Original content. Timely news and views from a select group of opinion leaders. Special extras.
  • Everything you need, nothing you don’t.
  • The Weekender: The climate news you need.
Subscribe

In the midst of a speech that for many observers ranged from meandering to unhinged to “downright scary”, one of the less-noticed moments was Trump’s boast that “we’ve ended the war on beautiful, clean coal, and it’s just been announced that a second, brand new coal mine, where they’re going to take out clean coal—meaning, they’re taking out coal. They’re going to clean it—is opening in the state of Pennsylvania, the second one.”

The Washington Post calls that “one of the more perplexing comments during the often off-message rally”, adding that “although Trump has positioned himself as an advocate of the fledgling technology, it’s unclear whether he really understands the basics of it.” Trump’s comment “suggests the carbon is somehow captured before the coal is burned—which is definitely not the case.” As Matt Lucas of the non-profit Center for Carbon Removal told the Post in an email, “‘clean coal’ refers to capturing the carbon dioxide after the coal is burned.”

The paper adds that Trump “may have been referring to another pollution reduction practice called ‘coal washing,’ where soil and rock is washed away from mined coal before being burned. But that is not the same as carbon capture and storage.”

While fossil industries and some U.S. senators support that technology, “some environmental groups, such as the Sierra Club, argue that no coal-burning technology can be called ‘clean’ given the levels of soot and other traditional pollutants such plants emit relative to nuclear, wind, solar, and even natural gas-fired power plants,” writes reporter Dino Grandoni.

Moreover, the Bismarck Tribune notes, “some researchers say that even carbon capture won’t make coal ‘clean.’ That’s because the gas that’s removed during coal-fired power generation can be pumped underground to increase the amount of crude oil extracted from aging reserves.” (Or from tar sands/oil sands operations in Canada.) “Critics say the greenhouse gases resulting from increased oil production would offset any gains made at the coal plants.”

The Post and other news outlets note that Trump’s budgetary moves haven’t matched up with his rhetorical support for CCS development. “In May, the White House proposed slashing the budget of the Energy Department’s Office of Fossil Energy, which backs carbon capture research, and eliminating a loan program for companies developing carbon capture and other innovative energy technologies, arguing that ‘the private sector is better positioned to finance innovative technologies,’” Grandoni writes.

“There’s a big gulf between the president’s words and the actions of the administration on support for carbon capture,” said Dan Reicher, executive director of the Stanford University-based Steyer-Taylor Center for Energy Policy and Finance.



in CCS & Negative Emissions, Coal, Energy Politics, United States

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

U.S. Bureau of Land Management/flickr
Oil & Gas

Biden Approves $8B Oil Extraction Plan in Ecologically Sensitive Alaska

March 14, 2023
130
David Dodge, Green Energy Futures/flickr
Community Climate Finance

U.S. Solar Developers Scramble after Silicon Valley Bank Collapse

March 14, 2023
464
EcoAnalytics
Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion

Canadians Want Strong Emissions Cap Regulations, Not More Missed Targets

March 14, 2023
140

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

David Dodge, Green Energy Futures/flickr

U.S. Solar Developers Scramble after Silicon Valley Bank Collapse

March 14, 2023
464
Environmental Defence Canada/flickr

Repsol Abandons Plan to Ship Canadian LNG to Europe

March 18, 2023
248
Joshua Doubek/Wikipedia

No New Jobs Came from Alberta’s $4B ‘Job Creation’ Tax Cut for Big Oil

October 6, 2022
852
Rebecca Bollwitt/flickr

Fossils Stay ‘Oily’, Gibsons Sues Big Oil, U.S. Clean Energy Booms, EU Pushes Fossil Phaseout, and Fukushima Disaster was ‘No Accident’

March 14, 2023
211
Behrat/Wikimedia Commons

Hawaii Firm Turns Home Water Heaters into Grid Batteries

March 14, 2023
469
NTSB

Ohio Train Derailment, Toxic Chemical Spill Renews Fears Over Canada-U.S. Rail Safety

March 8, 2023
1.4k

Recent Posts

U.S. Bureau of Land Management/flickr

Biden Approves $8B Oil Extraction Plan in Ecologically Sensitive Alaska

March 14, 2023
130
EcoAnalytics

Canadians Want Strong Emissions Cap Regulations, Not More Missed Targets

March 14, 2023
140
U.S. National Transportation Safety Board/flickr

$30.9B Price Tag Makes Trans Mountain Pipeline a ‘Catastrophic Boondoggle’

March 14, 2023
254
Raysonho/wikimedia commons

Purolator Pledges $1B to Electrify Last-Mile Delivery

March 14, 2023
90
United Nations

UN Buys Tanker, But Funding Gap Could Scuttle Plan to Salvage Oil from ‘Floating Time Bomb’

March 10, 2023
97
Gage Skidmore/Wikimedia Commons

Biden Cuts Fossil Subsidies, But Oil and Gas Still Lines Up for Billions

March 10, 2023
192
Next Post
Tammy/Wikimedia Commons

Passive House Design Did 40% Better in Vancouver’s Cool Efficiency Test

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}