• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
Celebrating our 1,000th edition. The climate news you need
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  FEATURED
Ex-Fossil Workers Convert Old Oilfields to Solar Farms After ‘Rapid Upskilling’ in Alberta June 29, 2022
London Becomes Biggest City to Sign Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty June 29, 2022
G7 Miss ‘Golden Opportunity’, Walk Back Pledge to Cut International Fossil Finance June 29, 2022
Soaring Fertilizer Prices Could Deliver ‘Silver Lining’ For Emissions, But Farmers Struggle to Limit Use June 26, 2022
BREAKING: UN Nature Summit, the ‘Paris Conference for Biodiversity’, Moves to Montreal in December June 19, 2022
Next
Prev
Opinion & Analysis
Home Jurisdictions Canada

Mixed Reaction to Gore’s Inconvenient Sequel Points to ‘Hacked’ Democracies

August 10, 2017
Reading time: 4 minutes
Primary Author: compiled by Mitchell Beer @mitchellbeer

Al Gore / Wikipedia

Al Gore / Wikipedia

 

With climate veteran Al Gore’s new film, An Inconvenient Sequel, in theatres this month, the mixed, sometimes brutal reaction to the film is emblematic of a still-polarized public debate over climate change, and the relentless battering Gore himself has taken since the release of his Academy Award-winning An Inconvenient Truth in 2006.

While Sequel has largely received a warm welcome within the climate and energy community, critical coverage has touched on old themes and new: that the film puts too much spotlight on Gore, potentially exaggerates his role in brokering a key component of the 2015 Paris agreement, and is destined by its very existence to further divide an already fractured public dialogue. But the reportage also includes snapshots of the film’s potential as a powerful front-line organizing tool.

Writing in New Scientist, Climate Outreach Research Director Adam Corner suggests Gore “should have stayed in the wings for the follow-up” to his original production, rather than producing a film that will mainly preach to the converted.

While the partisan split over climate has persisted over the last 11 years, “public attitudes to the political establishment have changed markedly, with a populist backlash far and wide,” Corner writes. “In this context, is a film fronted by a highly polarizing political figure the right choice for a big-budget climate campaign in 2017? Unless Gore and the film’s producers envisage campaigners dragging their climate-skeptic uncles to the cinema with them, the documentary can only hope to further galvanize the already-concerned.”

A more effective choice, he argues would have been “for Gore to remove himself from the picture, dial down the Republican-baiting, and instead provide a platform for new, less politically divisive voices.”

Climate hawk Eric Holthaus makes a similar argument on Grist, citing early ratings for the second film to argue that Gore “might be an inconvenient vessel for this message”: of the first 1,219 IMDb users to rate Sequel, 38.8% gave it a perfect 10, 43.1% rated it 1 out of 10, and the remaining 18.1% fell somewhere in between.

“The very definition of a polarized population,” tweeted @kevpluck.

But Holthaus also describes the moment when Sequel become the film he wanted to see.

“I turned the corner on An Inconvenient Sequel when Gore steps aside and lets his most important career achievement—the thousands of activists he’s personally trained over the past decade—take the stage,” he writes.

“Since 2006, Gore’s Climate Reality Project has conducted 35 workshops training more than 12,000 activists from ages 7 to 87 representing 137 countries. Gore himself usually presents roughly half the content. These trainees then go on to give the famous slide show at schools and community organizations. They are able to relate personally to their audience—without any of the political baggage that Gore carries everywhere with him.”

[From direct experience, the 2013 training in Chicago was worth every minute. In Canada, Climate Reality reports that 621,251 people have attended a community presentation.]

On New Republic, meanwhile, staff writer Emily Atkin takes aim at the predictable, inevitable alt-right backlash against Gore’s supposedly sky-high carbon footprint. The conservative National Center for Public Policy Research first introduced the argument in response to An Inconvenient Truth, and now…it’s back.

“Climate deniers, funded by the fossil fuel industry, continue to wage misleading personal attacks on Al Gore as a way of trying to cast doubt on established climate science and distract attention from the most serious global threat we face,” Gore Communications Director Betsy McManus told Atkin. “Vice President Gore leads a carbon-neutral life by purchasing green energy, reducing carbon impacts, and offsetting any emissions that cannot be avoided, all within the constraints of an economy that still relies too heavily on dirty fossil fuels.”

But Atkin takes the issue a step farther, questioning the very notion that climate advocates should be expected to live carbon-neutral lifestyles.

“Ultimately the argument is deceitful faux-populism,” she writes, “and the real hypocrites here are the purveyors of it.” She chronicles a relentless barrage of attacks—on Gore and many other climate and clean energy advocates—underscoring the disconnect in the argument itself.

“An anti-abortion advocate who believes abortion is immoral and should be illegal, but gets one herself, is a hypocrite,” Atkin writes. “But climate change advocates who don’t live a carbon-neutral lifestyle aren’t hypocrites because, for the most part, they’re not asking you to live a carbon-neutral lifestyle. They’re asking governments, utilities, energy companies, and large corporations to increase their use of renewable energy so that you can continue to live your life as you please, without contributing to global warming.”

In an interview with The Guardian, Gore puts the attacks in the context of a wider “assault on reason” that he traces back to “dark money”, billionaire political funders, and a democratic process he says has been “hacked”.

“In order to fix the climate crisis, we need to first fix the government crisis,” he says. “Those with access to large amounts of money and raw power have been able to subvert all reason and fact in collective decision-making,” making it clear that they’re “trying to cripple our ability to respond to this existential threat.”



in Canada, Climate Action / "Blockadia", Climate Denial & Greenwashing, Culture, Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion, Opinion & Analysis, United States

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Keith Hirsche
Jobs & Training

Ex-Fossil Workers Convert Old Oilfields to Solar Farms After ‘Rapid Upskilling’ in Alberta

June 29, 2022
304
London Eye UK England
Cities & Communities

London Becomes Biggest City to Sign Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty

June 29, 2022
103
Number 10/flickr
International Agencies & Studies

G7 Miss ‘Golden Opportunity’, Walk Back Pledge to Cut International Fossil Finance

June 29, 2022
116

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Keith Hirsche

Ex-Fossil Workers Convert Old Oilfields to Solar Farms After ‘Rapid Upskilling’ in Alberta

June 29, 2022
304
François GOGLINS/wikimedia commons

Corrosion Problem Shutters Half of France’s Nuclear Reactors

June 29, 2022
131
David/flickr

U.S. Supreme Court Expected to Gut Emission Controls as Climate Scientists Petition for Plan B

June 26, 2022
1.2k
Number 10/flickr

G7 Miss ‘Golden Opportunity’, Walk Back Pledge to Cut International Fossil Finance

June 29, 2022
116
London Eye UK England

London Becomes Biggest City to Sign Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty

June 29, 2022
103
Danielle Scott/flickr

Advocate Urges Ottawa to Intervene Before Ontario Builds Highway 413

June 29, 2022
87

Recent Posts

AJEL / Pixabay

Windfall Tax on Food, Fossil, Pharma Giants Would Raise $490B to Solve ‘Catastrophic’ Food Crisis: Oxfam

June 29, 2022
48
futureatlas.com/flickr

Ottawa Demands Deeper Fuel Emissions Cuts, Offers Fossils a Double-Dip on Tax Breaks

June 29, 2022
72
Province of B.C./flickr

Comox Joins Municipalities Seeking Ban on New Gas Stations

June 29, 2022
58
/Piqsels

Refocus Agriculture Spending to Cut Emissions, Boost Productivity, OECD Urges Governments

June 29, 2022
25
Jimmy Emerson, DVM/flickr

Public Vigilance Key to Protecting Greenbelts for Climate Resilience, Report Finds

June 29, 2022
27
Miguel V/Wikimedia Commons

Forests Fall Short of Full Carbon Storage Potential, Study Finds

June 29, 2022
46
Next Post
Simon Berry/flickr

Mobile App Partnership Offering Solar to One Million Off-Grid Customers in Africa

The Energy Mix

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}