• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
BP Predicts Faster Oil and Gas Decline as Clean Energy Spending Hits $1.1T in 2022 January 31, 2023
Canada Needs Oil and Gas Emissions Cap to Hit 2030 Goal: NZAB January 31, 2023
Ecuador’s Amazon Drilling Plan Shows Need for Fossil Non-Proliferation Treaty January 31, 2023
Rainforest Carbon Credits from World’s Biggest Provider are ‘Largely Worthless’, Investigation Finds January 31, 2023
Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing January 23, 2023
Next
Prev

Kinder Morgan Restarts Route Approval Process as Opposition Mounts

May 16, 2017
Reading time: 3 minutes

Mark Klotz/Flickr

Mark Klotz/Flickr

 

Kinder Morgan, the company behind the embattled Trans Mountain pipeline expansion, has hurt its own cause with a series of “basic process gaffes” that will delay the National Energy Board’s review of the company’s detailed route for the project, Chilliwack, B.C.-based WaterWealth Project contends in a news advisory released yesterday.

“This new development gives concerned citizens 30 days after Kinder Morgan publishes new notices for each route segment to drum up and consolidate opposition,” said WaterWealth Program Director Ian Stephen. “Kinder Morgan is not only struggling to find investors for its $7.4-billion pipeline, it’s now struggling to find an acceptable route through British Columbia.”

  • Concise headlines. Original content. Timely news and views from a select group of opinion leaders. Special extras.
  • Everything you need, nothing you don’t.
  • The Weekender: The climate news you need.
New!
Subscribe

Kinder Morgan began the regulatory process for getting its pipeline route approved last December 9, less than two weeks after Prime Minister Justin Trudeau gave the project a green light. “Under section 36 of the National Energy Board Act, the Board will not approve the route of a pipeline until it has taken into account all written statements and representations made at public hearings ‘in order to determine the best possible detailed route of the pipeline and the most appropriate methods and timing of constructing the pipeline,’” WaterWealth explains.

But Kinder made mistakes in filing public notices for different sections of the pipeline, leading to several motions to the NEB asking for extended deadlines. The Board gave Kinder until May 15 to respond, and on Monday the company announced it would republish its notices for the entire route.

That decision “effectively restarts the detailed route process,” WaterWealth states, “with new 30-day periods following publications on all segments of the route for statements of opposition, and hearings pushed back until the Board can assess statements filed in the new period, in addition to the hundreds already filed.”

Despite logistical challenges with the NEB’s online filing process, WaterWealth says 356 objections have already been lodged, more than half of them from Chilliwack. The inventory includes “statements from the City, the Chamber of Commerce, local First Nations, and almost 200 individual residents. All are calling for the route to be changed to protect the source of drinking water for some 86,000 residents and businesses.” Now, Stephen notes, the effort to mobilize opposition along the route enters a new phase.

Timing matters for Kinder Morgan, with analysts pointing to rising project costs and regulatory delays as factors that could imperil the project. “The pipeline’s customers have the ability to back out of their contracts, or renegotiate rates with Kinder Morgan, if the cost goes over $6.8 billion or the regulatory approval is pushed past the end of 2017,” analyst David Alton Clark on the Seeking Alpha investment site warned in January.

And if the pipeline failed altogether, “the cancellation of the Trans Mountain project would essentially be a death knell” for the Houston-based pipeline giant.

Since then, Kinder has admitted the project will likely break through its cost ceiling, but claimed shippers are still lining up to book capacity on the pipeline.



in Canada, Cities & Communities, Climate Action / "Blockadia", Community Climate Finance, Pipelines / Rail Transport

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Mike Mozart/Flickr
Ending Emissions

BP Predicts Faster Oil and Gas Decline as Clean Energy Spending Hits $1.1T in 2022

February 4, 2023
331
Gina Dittmer/PublicDomainPictures
Canada

Canada Needs Oil and Gas Emissions Cap to Hit 2030 Goal: NZAB

January 31, 2023
196
CONFENIAE
Ending Emissions

Ecuador’s Amazon Drilling Plan Shows Need for Fossil Non-Proliferation Treaty

January 31, 2023
61

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Mike Mozart/Flickr

BP Predicts Faster Oil and Gas Decline as Clean Energy Spending Hits $1.1T in 2022

February 4, 2023
331
Sam Balto/YouTube

Elementary School’s Bike Bus Brings ‘Sheer Joy’ to Portland Neighbourhood

February 5, 2023
262
Lucio Santos/flickr

Canadian Banks Increased Fossil Investment in 2021, Report Card Shows

November 27, 2022
116
Kenuoene/pixabay

$50B Opportunity Means ‘Go Time’ for Canadian Renewables: CanREA CEO

December 19, 2022
574
RL0919/wikimedia commons

Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing

January 23, 2023
2.4k
openthegovernment.org

BREAKING: U.S. Senate Passes Historic $369B Climate Package

August 8, 2022
541

Recent Posts

Gina Dittmer/PublicDomainPictures

Canada Needs Oil and Gas Emissions Cap to Hit 2030 Goal: NZAB

January 31, 2023
196
CONFENIAE

Ecuador’s Amazon Drilling Plan Shows Need for Fossil Non-Proliferation Treaty

January 31, 2023
61
Ken Teegardin www.SeniorLiving.Org/flickr

Virtual Power Plants Hit an ‘Inflection Point’

January 31, 2023
125
/snappy goat

Rainforest Carbon Credits from World’s Biggest Provider are ‘Largely Worthless’, Investigation Finds

January 31, 2023
94
Victorgrigas/wikimedia commons

World Bank Climate Reforms Too ‘Timid and Slow,’ Critics Warn

January 31, 2023
42
Doc Searls/Twitter

Guilbeault Could Intervene on Ontario Greenbelt Development

January 31, 2023
132
Next Post
Epattloamer/Wikimedia Commons

Asia’s Commitment to EVs May Drain Demand for Gasoline

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}