• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
  FEATURED
BREAKING: Don’t Attend COP 28 Unless You’re There to Help, Figueres Tells Oil and Gas September 21, 2023
Thorold Gas Peaker Plant Won’t Be Built After Unanimous City Council Vote September 20, 2023
Indoor Heat Leaves Canadians Unsafe with ‘No Escape’, CBC Investigation Finds September 20, 2023
Agrivoltaics a Win-Win for Farmers, Communities, Solar Developers, and Alberta’s UCP September 20, 2023
‘Beginning of the End’ for Oil and Gas as IEA Predicts Pre-2030 Peak September 19, 2023
Next
Prev

B.C.’s Clark Pivots Against Coal as Election Day Closes In

May 2, 2017
Reading time: 3 minutes

Loxy!!/wikimedia commons

Loxy!!/wikimedia commons

 

There were several ways to read British Columbia Liberal Premier Christy Clark’s mid-election pivot against coal exports from her province. The National Observer sees her remarks on the campaign trail last week as “changing the debate” on coal and climate. Not all interpretations have been so kind.

After years of routinely boosting her province’s fossil energy sector, Clark, who faces voters in a general election on May 9, “called on Prime Minister Trudeau to enact a complete ban on all thermal coal exports from B.C. ports,” the Observer reports. Her published letter to the PM “makes clear she understands coal is climate enemy number one and an energy source in permanent decline,” the Observer states.

  • Concise headlines. Original content. Timely news and views from a select group of opinion leaders. Special extras.
  • Everything you need, nothing you don’t.
  • The Weekender: The climate news you need.
Subscribe

“Her letter has changed the debate over coal in B.C. forever,” the paper adds. “You don’t walk back bold statements like this.”

Then yesterday, Clark doubled down on her anti-coal stance, telling listeners during a campaign swing through the British Columbia interior that “if the federal government won’t, the Liberals would impose a carbon price of about $70 per tonne on thermal coal if they are re-elected in the May 9 election,” according to Global News. Reports suggested that Clark’s promised tax would apply only to coal shipped through the province, not to that produced in several mines in the province.

But Clark may just be reading her electorate’s mood. “Clark is bowing to pressure from constituents,” said Ariel Ross, coal campaigner for Vancouver-based Dogwood Institute. “It took a long time, but we’re finally here.”

The pro-business, U.S.-owned Vancouver Sun, meanwhile, cast the remarks as Clark grandstanding against the United States’ imposition of renewed countervailing duties in response to its long-standing claim that public ownership of Canadian forest lands constitutes an illegal government subsidy for exported lumber.

According to that paper, Clark was willing to accept the proposed Fraser River coal port until the Trump administration threatened the province’s softwood lumber exports. “We had an obligation to be good trading partners with our trading partners in the United States,” Clark told reporters at a Vancouver area paper mill. “They are no longer good trading partners with Canada. So that means we’re free to ban filthy thermal coal from B.C. ports, and I hope the federal government will support us in doing that.”

Clark, who is under acute pressure over her government’s record of accepting large donations from corporations it has subsequently lavished with large contracts, may also have hoped to drive a wedge into support for her nearest rival in next week’s provincial election, the New Democratic Party’s John Horgan. The NDP, the Observer notes, has hedged on the new coal port proposed for the Fraser River, refusing to condemn it.

The third-place B.C. Green Party, led by climate scientist Andrew Weaver, has long opposed coal exports through the province. The Greens are the focus of an aggressive NDP campaign aimed at dissuading potential supporters from “vote-splitting” which, New Democrats contend, threatens to return Clark to power.

Whatever Clark’s political triangulation, Dogwood’s Ross welcomed her decision. “With an election in just two weeks, the B.C. Liberals need to be able to point to at least one environmentally friendly policy,” she said. “Still, I’m glad to see the Premier take one simple step to stop dirty American coal trains from polluting B.C. communities. This is a great opportunity for all the parties to join the twenty-first century and close the chapter on this dying industry.”



in Canada, Coal, Energy Politics, Sub-National Governments, United States

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

UN Climate Change/flickr
COP Conferences

BREAKING: Don’t Attend COP 28 Unless You’re There to Help, Figueres Tells Oil and Gas

September 21, 2023
203
Jon Sullivan/flickr
Ontario

Thorold Gas Peaker Plant Won’t Be Built After Unanimous City Council Vote

September 21, 2023
517
Rewat Wannasuk/Pexels
Heat & Power

Virtual Power Plants Could Cut Peak Demand 20%, Save U.S. Grid $10B Per Year

September 20, 2023
66

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

UN Climate Change/flickr

BREAKING: Don’t Attend COP 28 Unless You’re There to Help, Figueres Tells Oil and Gas

September 21, 2023
203
Jon Sullivan/flickr

Thorold Gas Peaker Plant Won’t Be Built After Unanimous City Council Vote

September 21, 2023
517
Asurnipal/wikimedia commons

Agrivoltaics a Win-Win for Farmers, Communities, Solar Developers, and Alberta’s UCP

September 20, 2023
108
Cullen328/wikimedia commons

Manufactured Housing Could Dent the Affordable Housing Crunch with Energy-Efficient Designs

September 20, 2023
81
Mr Renewables/Wikipedia

Californians Fight for New Community Solar Plan

September 20, 2023
80
Kristoferb/Wikimedia Commons

Canadians Could Save $10.4B, Cut Climate Pollution by Replacing Central Air with Heat Pumps

August 28, 2023
669

Recent Posts

Rewat Wannasuk/Pexels

Virtual Power Plants Could Cut Peak Demand 20%, Save U.S. Grid $10B Per Year

September 20, 2023
66
Jeremy Bezanger/Unsplash

Indoor Heat Leaves Canadians Unsafe with ‘No Escape’, CBC Investigation Finds

September 20, 2023
32
Wesley Fryer/flickr

Smart Thermostats Boost Grid Stability Amid Intense Heat

September 20, 2023
31
Plug'n Drive/Wikimedia Commons

Rural Carshares Ensure EV Push Leaves No One Behind

September 20, 2023
24
/Piqusels

‘Beginning of the End’ for Oil and Gas as IEA Predicts Pre-2030 Peak

September 19, 2023
405
Clean Creatives

‘Turning Point’ for PR Industry as Clean Creatives Targets Fossil Industry Contracts

September 19, 2023
256
Next Post
NRDC/Flickr

EPA, DoE Budgets Stand Firm as U.S. Negotiator-in-Chief Blinks Bigly

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
The Energy Mix - Energy Central
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}