• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
13 Canadian Fossils Linked to Massive Losses in Western Wildfires May 29, 2023
Hamilton Plans Canada’s First Heat Bylaw for Rental Housing May 29, 2023
UK Traffic Calming Strategy Produces Solid Results, Manufactured Anxiety May 29, 2023
Community Wind Farm Earns Support, Generates Income in German Village May 29, 2023
‘Remarkable Rebuke’: 130 U.S, EU Legislators Ask UN to Ditch Fossil CEO as COP 28 Chair May 23, 2023
Next
Prev

Carbon Offsets Don’t Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions

April 25, 2017
Reading time: 3 minutes

Hans / Pixabay

Hans / Pixabay

38
SHARES
 

Carbon offsetting—the practice of investing in offsite, frequently out-of-country greenhouse gas emission reductions to counterbalance a company’s own emissions—doesn’t work, and should be dropped from the menu of responses to achieve the Paris Climate Accord, two studies assert. The implications are especially stark for aviation.

The first report, prepared for the European Commission last year and published this month, found that 85% of the emission reductions claimed by carbon offset schemes would have happened anyway. That means they failed the key test for such offset schemes—that they achieve actual emission reductions that are “additional” to what would otherwise have occurred.

  • Be among the first to read The Energy Mix Weekender
  • A brand new weekly digest containing exclusive and essential climate stories from around the world.
  • The Weekender:The climate news you need.
Subscribe

Offsetting was allowed under the Kyoto Protocol’s Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) with the expectation that carbon emitters from developed countries, whose emissions were capped, would offset them by investing in emission-reducing projects in developing countries. However, Berlin’s Institute for Applied Ecology reported, “85% of the projects covered in this analysis, and 73% of the potential 2013-2020 supply, have a low likelihood that emission reductions are additional and not over-estimated. Only 2% of the projects and 7% of potential supply have a high likelihood of ensuring that emission reductions are additional and not over-estimated.”

“It’s a confirmation that offsetting is fundamentally problematic,” said Aki Kachi, international policy director for Brussels-based Carbon Market Watch, which reached much the same conclusion in its own report this month.

Carbon Market Watch’s concluded that the CDM was never intended to reduce emissions, only to neutralize (some of) their increase in developed nations. Its accounting has become more “problematic” under Paris, raising the risk that emission reductions may be counted twice—once under the Kyoto CDM, crediting the offset purchaser’s country, and again by the country where the reduction occurred, counting against its Paris commitment. The system also gave “perverse incentives” to developing countries to leave emissions unchecked while seeking offset sales, and assumed little technological progress. With those shortcomings, Carbon Watch found that the “vast majority of carbon offsets are very likely not additional, measureable, or real.”

Discrediting offsets as a credible way to claim greenhouse gas emission reductions will strike particularly hard at airlines. Global civil aviation agreed last October to what it claimed at the time was a “landmark accord” on climate change. It relied heavily on the international purchase of carbon emission offsets to achieve what the industry boasts will be “carbon neutrality” by 2020.

Air travel is expected to continue to expand, however, and the industry intends to close only part of the gap between actual fuel use and its carbon-neutral claim through more efficient aircraft. Most will be accomplished through the reduction in emissions that offsets claim to represent.

The EC study “is a wake-up call to the world that relying solely on offsets to address aviation’s climate impact is unsustainable,” warns Andrew Murphy, who tracks the industry for Brussels-based Transport and Environment. “Instead, the EU needs to pursue policies such as fuel taxation, ending subsidies, reforming the EU ETS [emissions trading system], and ceasing support for airport expansion.”

“At a minimum,” Murphy added, “The EU must ensure that the worst offset projects are excluded from the ICAO scheme to avoid greenwashing by the airline industry, the fastest-growing source of greenhouse gas emissions.”



in Air & Marine, Carbon Levels & Measurement, International, International Agencies & Studies, Legal & Regulatory, UK & Europe

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Martin Davis/Facebook
Carbon Levels & Measurement

13 Canadian Fossils Linked to Massive Losses in Western Wildfires

May 29, 2023
1
York Region/flickr
Heat & Temperature

Hamilton Plans Canada’s First Heat Bylaw for Rental Housing

May 29, 2023
3
Jörg Möller/Pixabay
Cities & Communities

UK Traffic Calming Strategy Produces Solid Results, Manufactured Anxiety

May 29, 2023
1

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Neal Alderson/Twitter

Out-of-Control Wildfire Burns Homes, Forces Evacuations Outside Halifax

May 29, 2023
64
pixabay

Anti-Mob Laws to Prosecute Fossils, Kudos for Calgary, 113M Climate Refugees, Orcas Fight Back, and a Climate Dictionary

May 24, 2023
134
Inspiration 4 Photos/flickr

Cooling Upper Atmosphere Has Scientists ‘Very Worried’

May 23, 2023
272
University of Oxford Press Office/flickr

PEROVSKITES: Qcells Plans First Production Line for ‘Miracle’ Solar Cell

May 23, 2023
435
Arctic Circle/flickr

‘Remarkable Rebuke’: 130 U.S, EU Legislators Ask UN to Ditch Fossil CEO as COP 28 Chair

May 23, 2023
399
François GOGLINS/wikimedia commons

Corrosion Problem Shutters Half of France’s Nuclear Reactors

August 2, 2022
3.7k

Recent Posts

Martin Davis/Facebook

13 Canadian Fossils Linked to Massive Losses in Western Wildfires

May 29, 2023
1
York Region/flickr

Hamilton Plans Canada’s First Heat Bylaw for Rental Housing

May 29, 2023
3
Jörg Möller/Pixabay

UK Traffic Calming Strategy Produces Solid Results, Manufactured Anxiety

May 29, 2023
1

Waste Heat from Quebec Data Centre to Grow 80,000 Tonnes of Veggies Per Year

May 29, 2023
5
kpgolfpro/Pixabay

Community Wind Farm Earns Support, Generates Income in German Village

May 29, 2023
8
Pexels/pixabay

Engineers Replace Sand in Concrete with Disposable Diapers

May 29, 2023
5
Next Post
Alfred Palmer/Wikimedia Commons

Fortune 500 Going Where Trump White House Fears to Tread

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}