• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
Celebrating our 1,000th edition. The climate news you need
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  FEATURED
Soaring Fertilizer Prices Could Deliver ‘Silver Lining’ For Emissions, But Farmers Struggle to Limit Use June 26, 2022
BREAKING: UN Nature Summit, the ‘Paris Conference for Biodiversity’, Moves to Montreal in December June 19, 2022
‘LET’S SUE BIG OIL’: Legal Team Launches Class Action Campaign for B.C. Municipalities June 17, 2022
‘It Could Have Been Any of Us’, Colleague Says, After Brazil Confirms Murders of Bruno Pereira, Dom Phillips June 17, 2022
Infrastructure Gap a ‘Life and Death’ Matter as Northern Canada Warms June 17, 2022
Next
Prev
Home Climate & Society Community Climate Finance

Unlikely Exxon Waiver Request May Distract from Poor Financial Results

April 21, 2017
Reading time: 3 minutes

Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons

 

ExxonMobil faces an uphill climb in its quest for U.S. government permission to pursue a Black Sea business deal with Russian oil company Rosneft, even with its former CEO now serving as Donald Trump’s secretary of state, the New York Times reports this week.

The request for an exemption from U.S. sanctions against Russia, first reported Wednesday in the Wall Street Journal, drew immediate, sharp criticism from Sen. John McCain (R-AZ). “Are they crazy?” he tweeted. Michael McFaul, U.S. ambassador to Russia under President Barack Obama, added that if the government approves the request, “then all that tough talk last week about Russia was just that — talk.”

But at the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA), Finance Director Tom Sanzillo sees the announcement as an attempt to distract from another poor quarterly report the company is about to release to shareholders.

“There is shrewd method to Exxon’s latest madness,” he writes. “In the very short term, on April 28, the company has a quarterly earnings call on which eager stock analysts will more than likely take the bait on Exxon-Rosneft and use their allotted time to go down the rabbit hole. What better way to deflect another shoddy quarter of performance?”

Exxon applied for the waiver under the Obama administration, and anonymous State Department and fossil industry officials told the Times the company is now pursuing the discussion with the Trump White House. The U.S. imposed economic sanctions after Russia invaded Crimea in 2014.

“The oil industry official said the application had been made in 2015, with ExxonMobil arguing that it could lose its contractual exploration rights in the Black Sea if it did not begin drilling operations by the end of 2017,” the paper reports. “European companies, particularly Eni, the Italian oil and gas giant, could then pick up the work.”

But “the proposal is now before the Trump administration at a delicate time in Russian-American relations, with rising tensions over the war in Syria and a looming congressional inquiry into reports of Russian efforts to influence the United States presidential election.”

Even in relatively normal times, the narrow focus of the current U.S. sanctions would make the Exxon request a poor bet for government approval. “I don’t think they would issue a licence, especially given the political context in which this takes place,” ex-Treasury Department official Hal Eren told the Times, adding that waivers are rarely requested and are usually only granted for environmental or safety reasons.

Russia, meanwhile, appears to be moving on from the discussion with Exxon. “We are going to drill with Eni next year,” Zeljko Runje, Rosneft’s vice president for offshore projects, told Russian media last year. “That is our plan. On the Black Sea.”

But the IEEFA’s Sanzillo says that plan looks anything but realistic. “The reserves in questions amount to a reported 100 million barrels of oil that would require a partnership investment between Russia and Exxon of perhaps as much as $500 billion to extract,” he writes. “Exxon has already squandered (pre-sanctions) $1 billion in investor money on the partnership, which—make no mistake—promises to lose money if it were somehow allowed to proceed.”

But the company will still “want the script to focus instead on breathless speculation around the U.S. government response to the sanctions waiver request and the implications of doing business with Putin, rather than zeroing in responsibly on the fact that $55-per-barrel oil will continue to hinder profits and shareholder payments for the next few years at least.”

Although Tillerson spoke out against sanctions while he was Exxon CEO, the Times notes that he’s been critical of Russia as U.S. secretary of state, and has not publicly suggested that sanctions be lifted. He’s promised to recuse himself from any Exxon-related decisions by the Trump administration.



in Community Climate Finance, International Security & War, Oil & Gas, UK & Europe, United States

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

David/flickr
United States

U.S. Supreme Court Expected to Gut Emission Controls as Climate Scientists Petition for Plan B

June 26, 2022
1k
Graco/Facebook
Food Security

Soaring Fertilizer Prices Could Deliver ‘Silver Lining’ For Emissions, But Farmers Struggle to Limit Use

June 27, 2022
189
Gustavo Petro Urrego/flickr
Forests & Deforestation

Colombia’s President-Elect Has ‘Ambitious’ Plans to Halt Amazon Deforestation

June 26, 2022
67

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

David/flickr

U.S. Supreme Court Expected to Gut Emission Controls as Climate Scientists Petition for Plan B

June 26, 2022
1k
Graco/Facebook

Soaring Fertilizer Prices Could Deliver ‘Silver Lining’ For Emissions, But Farmers Struggle to Limit Use

June 27, 2022
189
Konrad Summers/Kern West Oil Museum via Wikimedia Commons

Imperial Oil Backs Lithium Recovery Project in Alberta’s Leduc Oilfield

June 26, 2022
97
pxhere

Environmental Racism Bill Passes Second Reading in House of Commons

June 26, 2022
138
stockvault

Animal Agriculture Could Reduce Future Pandemic Risk, UK Researchers Say

June 26, 2022
73
Gustavo Petro Urrego/flickr

Colombia’s President-Elect Has ‘Ambitious’ Plans to Halt Amazon Deforestation

June 26, 2022
67

Recent Posts

Adam E. Moreira/wikimedia commons

Suspend Transit Fares, Not Gas Tax, Climate Advocates Urge Biden

June 26, 2022
55
moerschy / Pixabay

Pandemic Drives Up Support for Climate Action, Pessimism About Elected Leaders

June 26, 2022
27
hellomike/flickr

No Public Input as Canada Finalizes Climate Plan for Airlines

June 27, 2022
37
Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung Southeast Asia/wikimedia commons

Japan, Korea Sell Vietnam on Gas Amid Crackdown on Climate Activists

June 26, 2022
22
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/Barrow_Offshore_Wind_Farm

Global Offshore Wind Pipeline Doubles to 846 Gigawatts

June 26, 2022
38
TAFE SA TONSLEY/Flickr

U.S. Renewables Industries Scramble to Reuse, Recycle Before Waste Volumes Skyrocket

June 26, 2022
63
Next Post
Cows have competition … tree trunks in an upland forest in Maryland

Living trees are unlikely source of methane

The Energy Mix

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}