• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing January 23, 2023
Extreme Warming Ahead Even as Worst-Case Scenarios Grow ‘Obsolete’ January 23, 2023
Notley Scorches Federal Just Transition Bill as Fossil CEO Calls for Oilsands Boom January 23, 2023
IRON OXIDE: New Battery Brings Long-Duration Storage to Grids, 750 Jobs to West Virginia January 23, 2023
BREAKING: GFANZ Banks, Investors Pour Hundreds of Billions into Fossil Fuels January 17, 2023
Next
Prev

No New Coal Plants After 2020, EU Utilities Promise, But Policy Challenges Remain

April 7, 2017
Reading time: 4 minutes

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waste_heat

Wikipedia

 

Power utilities from all but two EU countries have promised to stop investing in new coal plants after 2020, as part of the continent’s push to meet its emission reduction targets under the Paris agreement.

“The power sector is determined to lead the energy transition and back our commitment to the low-carbon economy with concrete action,” said António Mexia, president of Eurelectric, an industry association that represents 3,500 utilities across the continent with combined value above €200 billion.

  • The climate news you need. Subscribe now to our engaging new weekly digest.
  • You’ll receive exclusive, never-before-seen-content, distilled and delivered to your inbox every weekend.
  • The Weekender: Succinct, solutions-focused, and designed with the discerning reader in mind.
New!
Subscribe

“Europe’s energy companies are putting their money where their mouths are,” said Eurelectric Secretary-General Kristian Ruby. “History will judge this message we are bringing here today. It is a clear message that speaks for itself, and should be seen in close relation to the Paris agreement and our commitment to provide 100% carbon-neutral electricity by 2050.”

“It is now clear that there is no future for coal in the EU,” said Climate Action Network-Europe (CAN-E) Director Wendel Trio. “The question is: what is the date for its phase out in the EU, and how hard will the coal industry fight to keep plants open, even if they are no longer economically viable?”

Euracoal Secretary-General Brian Ricketts said the continent will rely on “conventional sources” of energy until “we see a new energy system—with lots of energy storage—that works at an affordable price.” But a renewables industry insider told The Guardian “the debate about coal is over,” though “it would be good to see a phase out of existing coal plants.”

Ricketts is the coal executive who famously warned his members their industry “will be hated and vilified, in the same way that the slave traders were once hated and vilified” in the wake of the Paris agreement. Climate analysts say Europe will “vastly overshoot” its Paris target if it fails to phase out all its coal plants by 2030.

Only the power companies from Poland and Greece declined to sign on to the Eurelectric initiative, The Guardian reports. The Eurelectric initiative also faced initial opposition from Germany, “which is relying on coal to bridge a move away from nuclear energy to renewables under the ‘energiewende’ transition.”

In an opinion piece this week on Euractiv, CAN-E Coal Policy Coordinator Joanna Flisowska argues that coal must no longer be subsidized under the continent’s updated Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS). The redesign was the subject of a “trialogue” this week among representatives of the European Parliament, the Council of Ministers, and the European Commission.

“The scheme is in dire need of improvement in order to remain relevant,” Flisowska writes. “Tackling the large surplus of unused allowances and increasing the annual reduction rate are crucial elements of such a repair.”

But coal funding has been a stumbling block in negotiations so far, she writes.

“This is because the redesign offers a unique opportunity to finally exclude investments in the modernization of coal power plants from the ETS transition funds. But those who profit from the current subsidies for coal power put up a fight to defend the status quo.”

The transitional rule that allowed those subsidies was supposed to support modernization and diversification of electricity generation in Central and East European states, but produced €12 billion in coal subsidies between 2013 and 2019. It was only to run until 2020.

The failure of that provision, known as Article 10c, “cannot be a surprise,” Flisowska states. “The experience to date clearly demonstrates that the funds are being largely misused to subsidize fossil fuels, including coal. According to the Commission’s own calculations, in 2013, only about 10% of the investments through Article 10c were related to clean technologies or the diversification of the energy systems.”

Poland got nearly €7.5 billion out of the total subsidy and directed some of the funds to the Belchatow power station, the EU’s biggest emitter of greenhouse gases and other air pollutants.

The Eurelectric action and the CAN-E critique were backgrounded by a climate scoreboard released yesterday by the Brussels-based MaxiMiser low-carbon development project. It found that only 11 EU states published 2050 emission reduction strategies by 2015, as required by EU law. Only two of the 11 were what MaxiMiser considered “actionable”, only three contained ambitious climate and energy goals, only six were data-driven, and only three had adequate scope.

“Strong decarbonization strategies for 2050 and beyond are the backbone of EU climate action, so the fact that we are missing several key vertebrae is worrying,” said Imke Lübbeke, head of climate and energy at the WWF European Policy Office.

“A good low-emissions strategy should be in line with our Paris agreement climate goals, enforceable, transparent, and developed with business and civil society input. A few countries are getting it partly right, and some—for example, Germany—have already produced updated plans which are a good deal stronger than the 2015 versions. But a lot more must be done to ensure others catch up.



in Clean Electricity Grid, Coal, Ending Emissions, Energy Subsidies, UK & Europe

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

RL0919/wikimedia commons
Finance & Investment

Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing

January 23, 2023
2.2k
@tongbingxue/Twitter
Ending Emissions

Extreme Warming Ahead Even as Worst-Case Scenarios Grow ‘Obsolete’

January 23, 2023
307
Rachel Notley/Facebook
Jobs & Training

Notley Scorches Federal Just Transition Bill as Fossil CEO Calls for Oilsands Boom

January 23, 2023
285

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

RL0919/wikimedia commons

Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing

January 23, 2023
2.2k
EcoAnalytics

Albertans Want a Just Transition, Despite Premier’s Grumbling

January 23, 2023
274
United Nations

Salvage of $20B ‘Floating Time Bomb’ Delayed by Rising Cost of Oil Tankers

January 27, 2023
82
KHOU 11/YouTube

Texas Export Terminal Admits Human Error in LNG Explosion, Fire

August 21, 2022
3.1k
@tongbingxue/Twitter

Extreme Warming Ahead Even as Worst-Case Scenarios Grow ‘Obsolete’

January 23, 2023
307
Weirton, WV by Jon Dawson/flickr

IRON OXIDE: New Battery Brings Long-Duration Storage to Grids, 750 Jobs to West Virginia

January 23, 2023
527

Recent Posts

Rachel Notley/Facebook

Notley Scorches Federal Just Transition Bill as Fossil CEO Calls for Oilsands Boom

January 23, 2023
285
Sergio Boscaino/flickr

Dubai Mulls Quitting C40 Cities Over ‘Costly’ Climate Target

January 24, 2023
94
hangela/pixabay

New UK Coal Mine Faces Two Legal Challenges

January 24, 2023
47

Gas Stoves Enter U.S. Climate Culture War, Become ‘Bellwether’ for Industry

January 22, 2023
79
Jeff Hitchcock/flickr.

BREAKING: GFANZ Banks, Investors Pour Hundreds of Billions into Fossil Fuels

January 23, 2023
505

Exxon Had the Right Global Warming Numbers Through Decades of Denial: Study

January 17, 2023
227
Next Post
Coolcaesar/Wikimedia Commons

BREAKING: Court Upholds California Cap-and-Trade Program

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}