• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
  FEATURED
BREAKING: Fossil Fuels Fall 25% by 2030, Renewables ‘Keep the Path Open’ in IEA Net-Zero Update September 26, 2023
Green Space Groups Gear for Bigger Fights After Ontario Reverses Greenbelt Land Grab September 25, 2023
Community-Driven Solutions Can Take Back Ontario’s Electricity Future: Torrie September 25, 2023
‘Apex Oil and Gas Lobby’ Undercuts Canadian Sovereignty, Laxer Tells Foreign Influence Probe September 25, 2023
Momentum Builds Toward COP 28 as Countries Back Fossil Fuel Phaseout September 25, 2023
Next
Prev

New Impact Assessment Commission Would Boost Public Participation, Scientific Independence

April 7, 2017
Reading time: 4 minutes

Catherine McKenna/Facebook

Catherine McKenna/Facebook

 

A quasi-judicial Impact Assessment Commission will take the place of the discredited Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (CEAA) if the federal government accepts the recommendations of a four-member panel chaired by former environment and sustainable development commissioner Johanne Gélinas.

The “single authority” would be structured somewhat like the Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC), “with the power to make ‘final decisions’ on behalf of the government, through processes like formal hearings,” the National Observer reports. Its decisions could be appealed to Cabinet based on “errors” in decisions on sustainability, but those appeals would be “limited in time and by some measure of standing.”

  • Be among the first to read The Energy Mix Weekender
  • A brand new weekly digest containing exclusive and essential climate stories from around the world.
  • The Weekender:The climate news you need.
Subscribe

The panel also called for the federal government to lead a strategic impact assessment of the pan-Canadian climate framework “to meet the urgent national need for clarity and consistency on how to consider climate change in project and regional impact assessment to support Canada’s policy and sustainability goals.”

Stephen Hazell, director of conservation and general counsel at Nature Canada, said a strategic assessment could provide a more comprehensive view of the country’s greenhouse gas emissions. “Right now, the federal government has no idea what projects are in the pipeline, so to speak, that are going to produce a lot of greenhouse gas emissions,” Hazell told the Observer. “Canadians, I think, would agree overall that this is an area that the federal government would need to take an interest in.”

The enabling legislation for the Impact Assessment Commission would replace the Harper-era Canadian Environmental Assessment Act and “would include new standards for Indigenous consultation, more ways for the public to participate, and more scientific independence,” iPolitics reports. The assessment process as a whole would be “transformed from looking at environmental impacts to determining the overall social good of a project, a shift in purpose that requires greater powers and more research for the new regulator.”

Environment and Climate Minister Catherine McKenna opened a month-long public comment period that will run its course before she finalizes her response to the recommendations.

“This is one input into rebuilding trust in environmental assessments,” she said. “The most important consideration for me is making sure that we have the trust of Canadians in environmental assessments, that we can get good projects, good projects will go ahead, that we’re engaging and meeting our obligations to Indigenous peoples.”

Formation of the Impact Assessment Commission would bring an end to the CEAA’s present practice of working alongside the National Energy Board or the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission when it reviews projects within those agencies’ jurisdiction. “The panel recommends one institution be responsible for assessment, though it makes a distinction between a regulator’s technical evaluation and a general assessment of whether a project is in the public interest,” iPolitics notes. The new commission would also be “held accountable for the constitutionally-entrenched duty to consult and accommodate with Indigenous peoples, a powerful legal right that is often the subject of court disputes.”

The panel said any impact assessment authority must “increase its capacity to meaningfully engage with and respect Indigenous peoples, by improving knowledge of Indigenous peoples and their rights, history, and culture.”

The report also calls for a pre-assessment stage, before the plans for a future project are cast in stone, where Indigenous groups and the general public would have input. That change in process “could prove a pain for industries like the mining sector, where a level of confidentiality on future plans and the location of mineral staking are key for competitiveness,” writes iPolitics energy and resources specialist James Munson. But Hazell said the approach could reduce a lot of the paper burden and public contention built into the current CEAA process.

“We generate these boxcar loads of paper that don’t get read,” he said. “It’s great for the consultants, but it doesn’t actually help resolve the issues that are of importance to communities or to the proponent,” By contrast, the new approach “should allow for a much more expedited process.”

Ecojustice Program Director Karen Campbell saw good news and bad in the panel recommendations. “The idea of removing the NEB and the CNSC from conducting impact assessments is something we’ve asked for, so that’s a great development and we’re pleased to see it,” she told the Observer. But “we believe there needs to be an opportunity to judicially review the decisions of either the authority or of the Cabinet,” since “the Cabinet is not independent and accountable in the same way that the judiciary is.”



in Canada, First Peoples, Legal & Regulatory, Oil & Gas, Pipelines / Rail Transport, Tar Sands / Oil Sands

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Jason Blackeye/Unsplash
International Agencies & Studies

BREAKING: Fossil Fuels Fall 25% by 2030, Renewables ‘Keep the Path Open’ in IEA Net-Zero Update

September 26, 2023
213
Duffins Agriculture Preserve/North Country House Media via Greenbelt Foundation
Ontario

Green Space Groups Gear for Bigger Fights After Ontario Reverses Greenbelt Land Grab

September 25, 2023
89
UNDP/flickr
Heat & Power

Community-Driven Solutions Can Take Back Ontario’s Electricity Future: Torrie

September 26, 2023
102

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Jason Blackeye/Unsplash

BREAKING: Fossil Fuels Fall 25% by 2030, Renewables ‘Keep the Path Open’ in IEA Net-Zero Update

September 26, 2023
213
Cullen328/wikimedia commons

Manufactured Housing Could Dent the Affordable Housing Crunch with Energy-Efficient Designs

September 20, 2023
388
Wilson Hui/flickr

‘Apex Oil and Gas Lobby’ Undercuts Canadian Sovereignty, Laxer Tells Foreign Influence Probe

September 26, 2023
102
UNDP/flickr

Community-Driven Solutions Can Take Back Ontario’s Electricity Future: Torrie

September 26, 2023
102
Duffins Agriculture Preserve/North Country House Media via Greenbelt Foundation

Green Space Groups Gear for Bigger Fights After Ontario Reverses Greenbelt Land Grab

September 25, 2023
89
United Nations/Twitter

Momentum Builds Toward COP 28 as Countries Back Fossil Fuel Phaseout

September 26, 2023
80

Recent Posts

UniEnergy Technologies/wikimedia commons

Multi-Day Storage Can Deliver Cheaper Grid Reliability, Battery Maker Says

September 25, 2023
64
David Mellis/flickr

Top Food Brands Prepare for Supply Chains Disrupted by Climate Change

September 25, 2023
51
Power lines, Mississauga, Canada

Two First Nations Groups Vie to Build Northern Ontario Power Line

September 25, 2023
76
UN Climate Change/flickr

Don’t Attend COP 28 Unless You’re There to Help, Figueres Tells Oil and Gas

September 24, 2023
471
Jon Sullivan/flickr

Thorold Gas Peaker Plant Won’t Be Built After Unanimous City Council Vote

September 21, 2023
674
Rewat Wannasuk/Pexels

Virtual Power Plants Could Cut Peak Demand 20%, Save U.S. Grid $10B Per Year

September 20, 2023
128
Next Post
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waste_heat

No New Coal Plants After 2020, EU Utilities Promise, But Policy Challenges Remain

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
The Energy Mix - Energy Central
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Mobility
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}