• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
Celebrating our 1,000th edition. The climate news you need
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  FEATURED
BREAKING: No Public Finance for East Coast LNG Projects, Wilkinson Says July 4, 2022
‘Climate Math Gets Harder’ as Radicalized Supreme Court Upends U.S. Carbon Regulation July 4, 2022
Dire Living Conditions, Climate-Driven Heat Wave Produce Deadliest Human Smuggling Event in U.S. History July 4, 2022
Ex-Fossil Workers Convert Old Oilfields to Solar Farms After ‘Rapid Upskilling’ in Alberta June 29, 2022
London Becomes Biggest City to Sign Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty June 29, 2022
Next
Prev
Home Climate & Society Climate Denial & Greenwashing

TrumpWrap: U.S. Emissions Still Won’t Rise, Coal Companies Won’t Pay, Pruitt Under Scrutiny, and the Dirtiest Big Buildings in Manhattan

April 4, 2017
Reading time: 5 minutes
Primary Author: curated by Chris Wood

Gage Skidmore/Flickr

Gage Skidmore/Flickr

 

Donald Trump’s flurry of executive (dis)orders will probably prevent his country from meeting the targets President Barack Obama set under the Paris Climate accord to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions. But they likely won’t increase those emissions much, either, and they’ll fail entirely to turn back the economy’s conversion to clean energy.

Last week’s order to begin dismantling Obama’s signature Clean Power Plan “will most certainly lead to the U.S. missing its 2025 Paris agreement commitment,” Renewables Now forecast, “but it will not fully reverse existing trends on renewables or efficient cars.” It cited Climate Action Tracker (CAT) in concluding that if the order were carried out in full, U.S. emissions would remain at their current levels until 2030. America’s Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) commitment under Paris agreement envisions a 13% decrease in emissions by then.

On Monday, the Interior Department said it would restore coal companies’ ability to “short-change” U.S. taxpayers out of royalty returns they receive on the fossil fuel mineral extracted from public lands, the Denver Post reported.

“Rules in place since the 1980s,” the outlet explained, “allowed [mining] companies to sell their fuel to affiliates, and pay royalties to the government on that price, then turn around and sell the coal at higher prices, often overseas.” The Obama administration instituted a new rule that would have based royalties “on the price paid by an outside entity, rather than an interim sale to an affiliated company.”

The Interior Department scrapped the new rule, restoring the old. “Conservationists criticized the move,” the Post wrote, “calling it a ‘sweetheart deal’ for the industry that will deprive states of much-needed revenues.”

Scientific Intransigence

Meanwhile Trump’s lightning-rod pick to lead the Environmental Protection Agency, Scott Pruitt, may have run afoul of his own agency’s guidelines on scientific integrity. As Mashable tells the story, which first broke on Reuters, the policy obliges “all agency employees—including political appointees like Pruitt”—to “not knowingly misrepresent, exaggerate, or downplay areas of scientific uncertainty associated with policy decisions.”

Prompted by the Sierra Club, Mashable writes, the EPA’s scientific integrity office is reviewing whether Pruitt broke those rules when he told CNBC last month that he “would not agree that [human activity] is a primary contributor to the global warming that we see.” His comments contradicted the EPA’s own scientists, as well as its website.

Through a spokesperson, Pruitt offered “no apologies for having a candid dialogue about climate science and common-sense regulations that will protect our environment, without creating unnecessary regulatory burdens that kill jobs.”

Pruitt’s scientific intransigence may be killing something else, however: morale among the Environmental Protection Agency’s professional staff.

“The administration is moving as quickly as it can to diminish the place,” the Los Angeles times observes, “with plans to cripple the EPA science office, stop the agency’s climate change work, cut its Superfund program in half, and outright eliminate 50 programs, down to the voluntary Energy Star stickers that help consumers locate efficient appliances. [It] has openly accused the agency of producing junk science, pursuing a political agenda, and abusing its authority.”

Unsurprisingly, “the dim outlook is weighing heavily on its 15,000 scientists, engineers, investigators, and other employees, many of whom perceive their life’s work to be under assault from within,” the Times reports. One official with three decades of service to the EPA told the paper, “it is very hard to be here right now. There might have been slow progress on things like climate change under Bush-Cheney, but [the Trump administration is] battling with basic scientific facts. I have never seen anything like it.”

Even the agency’s first-ever administrator, Bill Ruckelshaus, who also served in the same role under President Reagan, lamented to the Los Angeles outlet that the agency’s retrenchment “is going to set us back in ways we can’t even predict.”

Meanwhile, the potential consequences of the Trump administration’s draft budget, which makes draconian cuts in most non-war-related U.S. public agencies, continue to emerge.

The Washington Post pointed to one cut at the U.S. Department of Energy (DoE) that may cost the country’s innovation economy dearly down the road. Trump’s White House “is aiming a half-billion-dollar cut at the main U.S. hub for renewable energy research—the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy—25% of the agency’s budget, and that’s just for the final five months of this federal fiscal year,” the Post declared. “Even deeper cuts are expected to be sought for 2018.” The little-known office “is credited with helping to drive the rapid expansion of rooftop solar panels, electric vehicle batteries, LED lighting, and more.”

Writing in Renewable Energy World, veteran Washington sustainable business consultant Scott Sklar mocked the administration’s priorities for being “as silly as stalling [the] cellular communications transition in order to save jobs manufacturing rotary and push button telephones.”

Citing DoE statistics, Sklar noted that “renewable energy employment (excluding efficiency) grew by nearly 18%” between 2015 and 2016. By the first quarter of 2016, “3,384,834 Americans were directly employed by the clean energy industry, which includes the energy efficiency, smart grid, and energy storage industries; electric power generation from the entire portfolio of renewable energy; renewable fuels production; and the electric, hybrid, and hydrogen-based vehicle industries.” In the same quarter, a similarly comprehensive figure for direct employment by the fossil-fuel industry was 2,989,844.

Dirtiest Buildings in Town

For its part, the New York Daily News reported that the extended Trump-Kuchner clan now apparently running much of the U.S. government’s international policy is making a further contribution to climate change through the buildings its members own in that city.

“A report from a coalition of labour and environmental activists,” the News wrote, “found that big buildings owned by Trump and his son-in-law and close adviser Jared Kushner are among the least energy-efficient in the city. Trump Tower uses more energy than 93% of the city’s large residential buildings, the report found, while a building on Fifth Avenue, owned by Kushner, “uses more energy than 85% of large office buildings.”

Washington Post’s political cartoonist Tom Toles, in a rare excursion into prose, summed up his thoughts under the headline: “The Republican assault on climate science is evil, and evil must be fought.”

“Legislation is being readied with the starkly Orwellian name HONEST, whose intent and provisions are cynically and specifically to make climate science harder to use in making policy,” Toles argued in a short, passionate essay. “This is the iron boot of raw power aimed squarely at the face of science and science-informed public policy.”

Its effect on “the climate of earth is the one legacy that will outlast [Trump’s] presidency by, oh, several millennia,” Toles concluded. “It is unacceptable, and they must be stopped.”



in Climate Denial & Greenwashing, COP Conferences, Energy Politics, Jobs & Training, Legal & Regulatory, United States

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Wikimedia Commons
Oil & Gas

BREAKING: No Public Finance for East Coast LNG Projects, Wilkinson Says

July 4, 2022
43
angela n./flickr
United States

‘Climate Math Gets Harder’ as Radicalized Supreme Court Upends U.S. Carbon Regulation

July 4, 2022
40
EdmondMeinfelder/flickr
Environmental Justice

Dire Living Conditions, Climate-Driven Heat Wave Produce Deadliest Human Smuggling Event in U.S. History

July 4, 2022
17

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

opinion polling gender green recovery climate action

Conservative Women Far More Likely Than Men to Support Green Transition, EcoAnalytics Research Finds

July 4, 2022
46
U.S. Navy/picryl

Montreal to Host New NATO Climate Centre as Military Analyst Confronts Global ‘Hyperthreat’

July 4, 2022
45
Wikimedia Commons

BREAKING: No Public Finance for East Coast LNG Projects, Wilkinson Says

July 4, 2022
43
angela n./flickr

‘Climate Math Gets Harder’ as Radicalized Supreme Court Upends U.S. Carbon Regulation

July 4, 2022
40
Maurits90/Wikimedia Commons

San Francisco Commuter Train Derailed by Scorching Track Temperatures, Extreme Heat

July 4, 2022
30
Keith Hirsche

Ex-Fossil Workers Convert Old Oilfields to Solar Farms After ‘Rapid Upskilling’ in Alberta

July 3, 2022
457

Recent Posts

EdmondMeinfelder/flickr

Dire Living Conditions, Climate-Driven Heat Wave Produce Deadliest Human Smuggling Event in U.S. History

July 4, 2022
17
Adrian Grycuk/Wikimedia Commons

Youth Climate Case Moves to Top Tribunal in European Court

July 4, 2022
20
Seci/wikimedia commons

Saudi Aramco Talks Net-Zero, Plans to Boost Production Through 2035

July 4, 2022
11
Keith Weller/Wikimedia Commons

U.S. Methane Plan Gives Big Ag a Free Pass

July 4, 2022
13
Fadi Hage/wikimedia commons

Indoor Farming Revolution Comes with Significant Carbon Cost

July 4, 2022
16
Mont SUTTON snow terrain

Southern Quebec Towns Scramble for Solutions as Water Sources Dwindle

July 4, 2022
21
Next Post
Kenuoene/pixabay

PURPA Avoided Cost Provision Wasn’t a Problem—Until It Worked

The Energy Mix

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}