• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing January 23, 2023
Extreme Warming Ahead Even as Worst-Case Scenarios Grow ‘Obsolete’ January 23, 2023
Notley Scorches Federal Just Transition Bill as Fossil CEO Calls for Oilsands Boom January 23, 2023
IRON OXIDE: New Battery Brings Long-Duration Storage to Grids, 750 Jobs to West Virginia January 23, 2023
BREAKING: GFANZ Banks, Investors Pour Hundreds of Billions into Fossil Fuels January 17, 2023
Next
Prev

U.S. States Back Away from Electric Vehicle Subsidies

March 15, 2017
Reading time: 3 minutes

Visitor7/wikimedia commons

Visitor7/wikimedia commons

 
Visitor7/wikimedia commons

Fossil fuel and other interests are working heavily Republican U.S. state houses in an effort to spike the tires of the electric car industry, the New York Times reports. The state-level action “could put the business of electric vehicles, already rocky, on even more precarious footing,” the paper warns, “particularly as gas prices stay low” and the Trump White House eases up on fleet fuel efficiency mandates.

“In some states, there is a move to repeal tax credits for battery-powered vehicles or to let them expire,” the Times writes. “In at least nine states, lawmakers have introduced bills that would levy new fees on those who own electric cars.” The actions have been taken in both “liberal-leaning [states] like Illinois, and conservative-leaning ones like Indiana,” the paper notes.

  • The climate news you need. Subscribe now to our engaging new weekly digest.
  • You’ll receive exclusive, never-before-seen-content, distilled and delivered to your inbox every weekend.
  • The Weekender: Succinct, solutions-focused, and designed with the discerning reader in mind.
New!
Subscribe

The effects were dramatic in mid-2015 when Georgia dropped a $5,000 tax credit for electric vehicle purchases and replaced it with a $200 additional registration fee, purportedly to make up for the gasoline tax EV drivers no longer pay to support road and bridge infrastructure. Monthly EV sales in the state plummeted from nearly 1,300 to “just 97 cars.”

Colorado legislators are weighing “a bill that would end income tax credits for owners of electric and alternative fuel vehicles,” the outlet reports. “In Utah, lawmakers voted this month against extending the state’s tax credit for electric cars.” Other states, “including Illinois, Pennsylvania, and Tennessee, have already let their incentives expire,” bringing the number offering incentives for e-car purchases down from 25 to 16.

Meanwhile, 10 states have levied special fees on electric or plug-in hybrid vehicle owners, and at least nine more, including Indiana, Kansas, and Montana, are considering them. “Even California is looking at imposing a $165 yearly car registration fee on zero-emissions vehicles,” the Times writes.

Colorado’s measure—and possibly others—have been backed by Americans for Prosperity, an advocacy group funded by the billionaire David H. and Charles G. Koch brothers, among the largest holders of licences in the Canadian tar sands/oil sands along with other fossil fuel and petrochemical assets.

The withdrawal of incentives “is going to crash this market,” warned Jessica Caldwell, an auto industry analyst at Edmunds.com. Less certain is whether state-level policy changes in the U.S. would alter bullish outlooks for electric vehicles’ growing share of global sales. Several analyses have suggested electric vehicles are “game-changers that the fossil fuel industry consistently underestimates.”

That means state policy reversals could leave the United States stuck in park while other nations speed ahead in innovation. “A slowdown in the country’s shift toward battery-powered vehicles could leave the American auto market a global laggard,” the Times notes. “A similar situation a couple of decades ago, when American car companies stayed away from small cars,” allowed Japanese automakers to enter the North American marketplace by dominating a key market segment, the paper recalls.

“It’s not just about the environment,” stressed Joel Levin, executive director of Plug In America, a non-profit organization that promotes electric cars. “These vehicles are also about being a leader in this new technology that everyone agrees is coming. If the U.S. isn’t a leader in this technology, we’ll be buying them from someone else.”

That someone else may well be China, the Times notes, where EV sales “are estimated to have jumped more than 70% last year” and created “the world’s biggest market for electric cars, with about 630,000 units on the road.”



in Auto & Alternative Vehicles, Climate & Society, Demand & Distribution, Ending Emissions, Energy Politics, Energy Subsidies, Jurisdictions, Legal & Regulatory, United States

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

United Nations
Air & Marine

Salvage of $20B ‘Floating Time Bomb’ Delayed by Rising Cost of Oil Tankers

January 27, 2023
14
RL0919/wikimedia commons
Finance & Investment

Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing

January 23, 2023
2.1k
@tongbingxue/Twitter
Ending Emissions

Extreme Warming Ahead Even as Worst-Case Scenarios Grow ‘Obsolete’

January 23, 2023
271

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

RL0919/wikimedia commons

Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing

January 23, 2023
2.1k
@tongbingxue/Twitter

Extreme Warming Ahead Even as Worst-Case Scenarios Grow ‘Obsolete’

January 23, 2023
271
Rachel Notley/Facebook

Notley Scorches Federal Just Transition Bill as Fossil CEO Calls for Oilsands Boom

January 23, 2023
256
James Vincent Wardhaugh/flickr

Canada Sidelines Ontario’s Ring of Fire, Approves Separate Mining Project

December 4, 2022
379
United Nations

Salvage of $20B ‘Floating Time Bomb’ Delayed by Rising Cost of Oil Tankers

January 27, 2023
14
Weirton, WV by Jon Dawson/flickr

IRON OXIDE: New Battery Brings Long-Duration Storage to Grids, 750 Jobs to West Virginia

January 23, 2023
493

Recent Posts

EcoAnalytics

Albertans Want a Just Transition, Despite Premier’s Grumbling

January 23, 2023
188
Sergio Boscaino/flickr

Dubai Mulls Quitting C40 Cities Over ‘Costly’ Climate Target

January 24, 2023
85
hangela/pixabay

New UK Coal Mine Faces Two Legal Challenges

January 24, 2023
43

Gas Stoves Enter U.S. Climate Culture War, Become ‘Bellwether’ for Industry

January 22, 2023
73
Jeff Hitchcock/flickr.

BREAKING: GFANZ Banks, Investors Pour Hundreds of Billions into Fossil Fuels

January 23, 2023
494

Exxon Had the Right Global Warming Numbers Through Decades of Denial: Study

January 17, 2023
223
Next Post

China takes fresh approach to pollution

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}