• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
SPECIAL REPORT: ‘Defuse the Climate Time Bomb’ with Net-Zero by 2040, Guterres Urges G20 March 20, 2023
Devastating Impacts, Affordable Climate Solutions Drive IPCC’s Urgent Call for Action March 20, 2023
Window for 1.5°C ‘Rapidly Closing’, IPCC Warns March 20, 2023
Swift Action, Inclusive Resilience Vital in Face of Overlapping Climate Hazards March 20, 2023
Shift from Fossils to Renewables is Quickest, Cheapest Path to Cut Emissions, IPCC Report Shows March 20, 2023
Next
Prev

Cheap Wind ‘Crosses the Threshold,’ Could Replace 6,000 GWh of Colorado Coal

August 29, 2016
Reading time: 3 minutes

hpgruesen/ Pixabay

hpgruesen/ Pixabay

 
hpgruesen / Pixabay
hpgruesen / Pixabay

Colorado is in a position to cut carbon and save ratepayers money, without risking the reliability of its electricity system, by replacing a massive 6,000 gigawatt-hours (GWh) per year of coal-fired generation with two gigawatts of wind, a team of clean energy advocates and financial analysts reported on Greentech Media earlier this month.

A dozen years after Colorado voters mandated a state renewable energy standard, “the scale of uneconomic and polluting assets on the grid, renewable energy’s potential to reduce costs and environmental impact, and the impact on the utility’s financial reality are now becoming clear,” writes Ron Lehr, who served as chair and commissioner of the Colorado Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) from 1984 to 1991.

  • The climate news you need. Subscribe now to our engaging new weekly digest.
  • You’ll receive exclusive, never-before-seen-content, distilled and delivered to your inbox every weekend.
  • The Weekender: Succinct, solutions-focused, and designed with the discerning reader in mind.
Subscribe

“Since wind and solar costs are continuing to decline, other utilities and states could eventually encounter the situation described…where new wind can beat operating costs of old fossil generation,” he writes. “As other stakeholders look into financial impacts of crossing the threshold where new renewable energy costs less than old fossil fuels, we hope Colorado’s experience encourages similar analyses in other places.”

Utility regulators in Colorado began noticing the new, cost-effective potential of wind and solar in 2013, Lehr recalls, when the two technologies captured 10% of a 6,200-MW portfolio the CPUC and the state’s Public Service Company (PSC) had opened up for new power supply.

“A striking notion then emerged,” he writes. “If wind and solar were coming into the PSC competitive bid process at costs lower than the average of the utility’s existing generation fleet, then some of those existing generators must be producing power at costs higher than new wind and solar. And if those old plants cost more than the newer wind and solar plants, shouldn’t they be shut down or retired to make room for more of the cheaper, cleaner energy generation?”

Utilities “have strong financial incentives to hang onto old plants and continue to profit from them, rather than sign power purchase agreements (PPAs) with wind and solar developers, on which they don’t profit,” Lehr notes. So “in Colorado, with low wind and solar costs at hand, the question became: How can fossil plants that raise the cost of service to consumers be shut down or retired in favour of new wind and solar to support, rather than oppose, the utility’s financial interests?”

After two years of analysis, Lehr and his colleagues estimated that seven of the PSC’s 10 remaining coal plants had higher operating, maintenance, and fuel costs than new wind supported by a $25-per-megawatt-hour Production Tax Credit. “No carbon or other emissions values were included in the financial analysis,” he adds. “So if these real costs were added to the evaluation, additional old coal plants would cost even more to run than new wind.”

A preliminary analysis also showed that none of the PSC’s older coal plants were contributing to the flexibility the utility needs to match the ups and downs of electricity demand, since natural gas plants generally serve that purpose on the Colorado system.



in Energy / Carbon Pricing & Economics

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Kenuoene/pixabay
Ending Emissions

Shift from Fossils to Renewables is Quickest, Cheapest Path to Cut Emissions, IPCC Report Shows

March 20, 2023
202
U.S. Bureau of Land Management/flickr
Oil & Gas

Biden Approves $8B Oil Extraction Plan in Ecologically Sensitive Alaska

March 14, 2023
165
/Pikist
Jobs & Training

Workers Move to Renewables as U.S. Fossil Sector Sheds Jobs

March 8, 2023
108

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Kenuoene/pixabay

Shift from Fossils to Renewables is Quickest, Cheapest Path to Cut Emissions, IPCC Report Shows

March 20, 2023
202
U.S. Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement/flickr

Willow Oil Project in Alaska Faces Legal Challenges, Economic Doubts

March 19, 2023
484
Kern River Valley Fire Info/Facebook

SPECIAL REPORT: ‘Defuse the Climate Time Bomb’ with Net-Zero by 2040, Guterres Urges G20

March 20, 2023
234
IFRC Intl. Federation:Twitter

Devastating Impacts, Affordable Climate Solutions Drive IPCC’s Urgent Call for Action

March 21, 2023
765
Secretariat of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine/Wikimedia Commons

IPCC Report Charts a Course for Ottawa’s ‘Clean Technology’ Budget

March 21, 2023
120
U.S. National Park Service/rawpixel

Window for 1.5°C ‘Rapidly Closing’, IPCC Warns

March 20, 2023
72

Recent Posts

FMSC/Flickr

Swift Action, Inclusive Resilience Vital in Face of Overlapping Climate Hazards

March 20, 2023
67
Kiara Worth, UNClimateChange/flickr

Gap Between IPCC’s Science, National Actions Sets Challenge for COP 28

March 21, 2023
68
Photo by IISD/ENB

IPCC Sees Deeper Risk in Overshooting 1.5°C Warming Threshold

March 20, 2023
44
EcoFlight

Historic Deal Reopens B.C. Indigenous Territory to Fracking, Promises Land Restoration

March 19, 2023
440
Wikimedia Commons/Humans of Vanuatu

Six Countries Call for Fossil-Free Pacific

March 19, 2023
50
Wikipedia

Fossil Funding Makes Indigenous Resource Network a ‘Propaganda Machine’, Opponent Says

March 19, 2023
79
Next Post

China's trans-Amazon railway stokes forest fears

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}