• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
Is Equinor’s Bay du Nord ‘Delay’ a Cancellation in Slow Motion? June 1, 2023
Analyst Sees Oil and Gas Running Short of Cash as IEA Releases Energy Investment Update May 30, 2023
House of Commons Motion, Senate Bill Urge New Climate Rules for Financial Institutions May 30, 2023
13 Canadian Fossils Linked to Massive Losses in Western Wildfires May 30, 2023
Hamilton Plans Heat Bylaw for Rental Housing May 30, 2023
Next
Prev

Witnesses Bring Blistering Criticism to Trans Mountain Review Panel

August 22, 2016
Reading time: 4 minutes

Maureen/Flickr

Maureen/Flickr

 
Maureen/Flickr
Maureen/Flickr

Kinder Morgan’s proposed Trans Mountain pipeline expansion came in for blistering criticism over the last week, as the City of Vancouver, First Nations, and climate and community advocates questioned the need for the project and the impartiality and effectiveness of the federal panel set up to review it.

The panel, announced last May by Natural Resources Minister Jim Carr, has a six-month mandate to double-check the National Energy Board’s approval of the $6.8-billion diluted bitumen pipeline, subject to 157 environmental, financial, and technical conditions. The decision also faces court challenges from the Squamish Nation and two environmental groups.

  • Be among the first to read The Energy Mix Weekender
  • A brand new weekly digest containing exclusive and essential climate stories from around the world.
  • The Weekender:The climate news you need.
Subscribe

Last week, Vancouver Mayor Gregor Robertson and City Manager Sadhu Johnston told the review panel that Kinder Morgan has no social licence or economic justification to triple the capacity of the existing Trans Mountain pipeline.

“There is no question from our analysis it’s not worth the risk. In fact, it’s not in Canada’s interest,” Robertson said, on the first of three days of panel hearings. “People and the environment are at risk, but there is very significant risk to Vancouver’s economy and the region’s economy.”

The second day of the hearings saw more than 300 members of the Musqueam, Squamish, and Tsleil-Waututh nations show up to protest the project, the National Observer reports. On Day Three, the hearing room was almost empty—a reaction that spoke louder than any rally, according to Grand Chief Stewart Phillip, president of the Union of BC Indian Chiefs.

“We’re not confident in the process,” Phillip told panelists. “Should we appear to endorse a process that is fundamentally flawed or do we do our speaking in the streets?”

“We’re in this together,” he added. “It’s not simply an Indigenous issue. It’s a fundamental human rights issue, it’s a climate change issue, it’s an environmental issue.”

Earlier in the week, former KPMG partner and PhD chemist Eoin Finn pointed to serious flaws in the panel process, reports The Observer’s Elizabeth McSheffrey.

“The NEB denied intervener status to hundreds and in the end, even resorted to locking the public out of public hearings,” he said. “In short, the NEB process is possibly the greatest farce ever inflicted upon Canadians, up until now.”

But even by that standard, he described the ministerial panel as a “slapdash reno job” whose “independence qualifications” are open to question, given panelist Kim Baird’s past business relationship with Kinder Morgan.

“This is simply unacceptable, an insult to the intelligence of Canadians,” Finn said. “It falls far short of what was promised by the federal government,” with a panel mandate that “seems to accept that the rather ill-defined, ‘significant adverse environmental risk’ is an appropriate test for an environmental assessment.”

On the Dogwood Initiative website, anti-fossil analyst and ex-journalist Kai Nagata concludes that the panel process runs counter to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s election promise to overhaul the NEB review process for existing project proposals as well as new ones. “If Trudeau issues permits on the basis of the slapdash assessment process so far, he won’t just face lawsuits from First Nations,” Nagata writes. “He’ll be betraying a written promise to British Columbians.”

After Nagata questioned candidate Trudeau on the issue during a campaign stop in B.C. last fall, he says he received a follow-up letter from Liberal Party President Anna Gainey. “Thank you for writing regarding the Liberal Party of Canada’s position on the Kinder Morgan Pipeline,” she wrote. “As you are aware, Justin Trudeau and the Liberal Party of Canada have serious concerns with the process surrounding the approval of this pipeline. We cannot support the pipeline in its current form because the Conservatives have not ensured environmental, community or stakeholder consent.”

Gainey added: We agree with what you, and Canadians across the country, have been saying for a long time: Canada’s environmental assessment process is broken.”

After publicly releasing the letter for the first time, Nagata compared the Liberals’ election commitment to the conduct of the ministerial panel, noting that there was no public record of testimony, no information on how or whether stakeholders were invited to participate, no process for testing contradictory evidence, and no apparent plan for reviewing 15,000 responses to an online questionnaire and hundreds of pages of scientific evidence rejected by the NEB.

“The conclusion I am forced to draw is that this ‘redo’ is nothing more than a political barometer for the government,” Nagata writes. “With no investigative powers, scientific expertise, or resources to speak of, the panel members sit mutely in their chairs and jot down a few half-hearted notes as people plead with them from the microphones. At the end, their report goes into a top hat and—poof!—the minister pulls out a yes or a no.”

“I’ve never been more frustrated in my life,” one participant told Nagata. “What a joke,” said another.



in Canada, Cities & Communities, Climate & Society, Climate Action / "Blockadia", Demand & Distribution, First Peoples, Fossil Fuels, Jurisdictions, Legal & Regulatory, Pipelines / Rail Transport

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Equinor
Oil & Gas

Is Equinor’s Bay du Nord ‘Delay’ a Cancellation in Slow Motion?

June 1, 2023
201
Ottawa Renewable Energy Co-op/Facebook
Climate Action / "Blockadia"

‘Hinge Moment’ for Humanity Demands ‘YIMBY’ Mentality: McKibben

June 1, 2023
12
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Notley
Energy Politics

Notley Would Have Backed Carbon Capture Subsidies, Smith Less Certain: Ex-Pipeline Exec

June 1, 2023
50

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Equinor

Is Equinor’s Bay du Nord ‘Delay’ a Cancellation in Slow Motion?

June 1, 2023
201
Neal Alderson/Twitter

Out-of-Control Wildfire Burns Homes, Forces Evacuations Outside Halifax

May 29, 2023
2.5k
/Piqusels

Analyst Sees Oil and Gas Running Short of Cash as IEA Releases Energy Investment Update

May 31, 2023
518
Equinor

Equinor Delays Bay du Nord Offshore Oil Project, Blames ‘Volatile’ Markets

May 31, 2023
96
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Notley

Notley Would Have Backed Carbon Capture Subsidies, Smith Less Certain: Ex-Pipeline Exec

June 1, 2023
50
Ryan Turnbull/Facebook

House of Commons Motion, Senate Bill Urge New Climate Rules for Financial Institutions

May 30, 2023
197

Recent Posts

Ottawa Renewable Energy Co-op/Facebook

‘Hinge Moment’ for Humanity Demands ‘YIMBY’ Mentality: McKibben

June 1, 2023
12
David Dodge, Green Energy Futures/flickr

Clean Energy to Add 700,000 New Jobs by 2050, with Alberta in the Lead

May 30, 2023
183
Martin Davis/Facebook

13 Canadian Fossils Linked to Massive Losses in Western Wildfires

May 30, 2023
578
York Region/flickr

Hamilton Plans Heat Bylaw for Rental Housing

May 31, 2023
428
David/flickr

Supreme Court Decision Undercuts U.S. Clean Water Act

May 30, 2023
78
Nicolas Rénac/Flickr

Climate Change to Cut Coffee Growing Lands by Over 50%

May 30, 2023
73
Next Post

Clouds' climate impact defies simple analysis

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}