• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
Repsol Abandons Plan to Ship Canadian LNG to Europe March 17, 2023
Biden Approves $8B Oil Extraction Plan in Ecologically Sensitive Alaska March 14, 2023
U.S. Solar Developers Scramble after Silicon Valley Bank Collapse March 14, 2023
$30.9B Price Tag Makes Trans Mountain Pipeline a ‘Catastrophic Boondoggle’ March 14, 2023
UN Buys Tanker, But Funding Gap Could Scuttle Plan to Salvage Oil from ‘Floating Time Bomb’ March 9, 2023
Next
Prev

B.C. ‘Takes Out the Trash’ with Friday Release of ‘Climate Procrastination Plan’

August 22, 2016
Reading time: 4 minutes

Loxy!!/wikimedia commons

Loxy!!/wikimedia commons

 
Loxy!!/wikimedia commons
Loxy!!/wikimedia commons

British Columbia waited until a quiet Friday afternoon in August to release a long-delayed climate plan that includes no increase in the province’s once-innovative carbon tax, postpones meaningful climate action for 15 years, and fails to fully accept any of the recommendations of the high-powered Climate Leadership Team that Premier Christy Clark had appointed to advise her on the plan.

“At Long Last, B.C. Releases a Plan…to Procrastinate Even More on Cutting Carbon Pollution,” Clean Energy Canada observed in its comments on what it called the province’s “Climate Leadership Procrastination Plan”.

  • The climate news you need. Subscribe now to our engaging new weekly digest.
  • You’ll receive exclusive, never-before-seen-content, distilled and delivered to your inbox every weekend.
  • The Weekender: Succinct, solutions-focused, and designed with the discerning reader in mind.
Subscribe

“If the primary goal of a climate plan is to cut carbon pollution, the B.C. government is planning to fail,” CEC said in a release. “Under this plan, British Columbia’s carbon pollution will be as high 15 years from now as it is today. Even looking out to 2050, this plan would leave B.C.’s carbon pollution four times higher than its legislated 2050 target”—and “this is the best-case scenario.”

“Last year, the Climate Leadership Team showed clearly that B.C. can both meet its climate targets and maintain a strong economy without trading one for the other. That’s still the right bar to be aiming for, and it’s a bar that B.C. has missed with today’s announcement,” agreed Josha McNab, the Pembina Institute’s B.C. director.

“A climate plan must do two things: reduce emissions, and support B.C.’s transition to a clean economy, so it can remain competitive in a decarbonizing global market. With today’s plan, B.C. has missed key opportunities on both fronts.”

B.C.’s $30-per-tonne carbon tax was groundbreaking when it was introduced in 2008, still standing as a signature achievement for ex-premier Gordon Campbell. But Clark, who faces a provincial election next spring, shocked analysts and observers by rejecting the Climate Leadership Team’s call for a $10-per-tonne increase beginning in 2018.

“I have to balance the need to make sure that our carbon tax remains world leading with the obligation to ensure that family affordability is at the forefront of our minds as well as protecting our economy and job creation,” she told media. “A climate plan is not just about carbon pricing.”

But while the premier announced a suite of 21 specific measures—from methane controls and reforestation, to expanded electric vehicle use—analysis by Clean Energy Canada indicated the plan would only cut 2.1 of the 25 megatonnes Clark claimed.

On Friday, Press Progress connected the deeply disappointing result of the province’s planning process with Clark’s decision to put a former Fraser Institute director in charge of translating the Leadership Team recommendations into policy. Key Leadership Team members took to Twitter with their frustration.

“Being asked as member BC’s Climate Leadership Team what I think of this plan,” tweeted climate analyst and campaigner Tzeporah Berman. “Pathetic and cowardly. U can quote me.” She added that “this is not a climate plan. It’s not even policy. It’s just PR.”

“BC climate leadership fizzles,” wrote CEC Executive Director Merran Smith. “BC’s carbon emissions will be about same in 2030 as today. Not leadership.”

“#BCClimatePlan to plant baby trees a farce,” commented Sierra Club BC. “Protecting old-growth is better #BCClimateFraud.”

McNabb said she was shocked the province had cherry-picked the Climate Leadership Team’s recommendations (and, critics pointed out, failed to implement any of them in full), when the expert panel had warned against precisely that response. “The Climate Leadership Team was very clear that the recommendations needed to be accepted as a package,” she told DeSmog Canada.

“They warned against picking and choosing amongst the recommendations that they put forward.”

She added that “the depths of August on a Friday afternoon is not the time you release a plan that you want a lot of people to pay attention to.”

DeSmog’s Emma Gilchrist noted that governments “often ‘take out the trash’ on Fridays during the dog days of summer, and this time is no different.



in Energy / Carbon Pricing & Economics

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

U.S. Bureau of Land Management/flickr
Oil & Gas

Biden Approves $8B Oil Extraction Plan in Ecologically Sensitive Alaska

March 14, 2023
131
/Pikist
Jobs & Training

Workers Move to Renewables as U.S. Fossil Sector Sheds Jobs

March 8, 2023
107
Pickering nuclear
Nuclear

Ontario Considers New Large-Scale Nuclear Plants Despite Cheaper, Renewable Options

March 1, 2023
268

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

David Dodge, Green Energy Futures/flickr

U.S. Solar Developers Scramble after Silicon Valley Bank Collapse

March 14, 2023
472
Environmental Defence Canada/flickr

Repsol Abandons Plan to Ship Canadian LNG to Europe

March 18, 2023
249
Joshua Doubek/Wikipedia

No New Jobs Came from Alberta’s $4B ‘Job Creation’ Tax Cut for Big Oil

October 6, 2022
853
Behrat/Wikimedia Commons

Hawaii Firm Turns Home Water Heaters into Grid Batteries

March 14, 2023
473
NTSB

Ohio Train Derailment, Toxic Chemical Spill Renews Fears Over Canada-U.S. Rail Safety

March 8, 2023
1.4k
Rebecca Bollwitt/flickr

Fossils Stay ‘Oily’, Gibsons Sues Big Oil, U.S. Clean Energy Booms, EU Pushes Fossil Phaseout, and Fukushima Disaster was ‘No Accident’

March 14, 2023
212

Recent Posts

U.S. Bureau of Land Management/flickr

Biden Approves $8B Oil Extraction Plan in Ecologically Sensitive Alaska

March 14, 2023
131
EcoAnalytics

Canadians Want Strong Emissions Cap Regulations, Not More Missed Targets

March 14, 2023
141
U.S. National Transportation Safety Board/flickr

$30.9B Price Tag Makes Trans Mountain Pipeline a ‘Catastrophic Boondoggle’

March 14, 2023
255
Raysonho/wikimedia commons

Purolator Pledges $1B to Electrify Last-Mile Delivery

March 14, 2023
91
United Nations

UN Buys Tanker, But Funding Gap Could Scuttle Plan to Salvage Oil from ‘Floating Time Bomb’

March 10, 2023
97
Gage Skidmore/Wikimedia Commons

Biden Cuts Fossil Subsidies, But Oil and Gas Still Lines Up for Billions

March 10, 2023
192
Next Post

Clouds' climate impact defies simple analysis

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}