• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
Celebrating our 1,000th edition. The climate news you need
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  FEATURED
Soaring Fertilizer Prices Could Deliver ‘Silver Lining’ For Emissions, But Farmers Struggle to Limit Use June 26, 2022
BREAKING: UN Nature Summit, the ‘Paris Conference for Biodiversity’, Moves to Montreal in December June 19, 2022
‘LET’S SUE BIG OIL’: Legal Team Launches Class Action Campaign for B.C. Municipalities June 17, 2022
‘It Could Have Been Any of Us’, Colleague Says, After Brazil Confirms Murders of Bruno Pereira, Dom Phillips June 17, 2022
Infrastructure Gap a ‘Life and Death’ Matter as Northern Canada Warms June 17, 2022
Next
Prev
Home Jurisdictions Canada

Quebec Court, Elizabeth May Pose Double NL Hydro Challenge

August 4, 2016
Reading time: 3 minutes

Martin Lopatka/Flickr

Martin Lopatka/Flickr

 
Martin Lopatka/Flickr
Martin Lopatka/Flickr

With low crude prices taking the air out of Newfoundland and Labrador’s offshore oil industry, an out-of-province court and a cross-country MP have put headwinds in the way of its hopes for more revenue from hydroelectricity exports.

First, the Quebec Court of Appeal upheld the strict terms of a contract negotiated nearly half a century ago by the province’s first post-Confederation premier for the sale of power from the 5.4-GW Churchill Falls generating station in Labrador. Then Green Party leader and B.C. MP Elizabeth May called on the Liberal government to rescind loan guarantees its Conservative predecessor issued in 2012 to the province’s Crown utility, Nalcor Energy, to build the troubled 824-MW hydro project at Muskrat Falls.

The contract Premier Joey Smallwood signed in 1969 has been a source of regret for most of his successors since. Newfoundland has long cried foul over its contract with Hydro-Québec, under which the latter buys Churchill Falls electricity at the provincial border at a contract-limited price and sells it to utilities in the northeastern U.S. at a significant profit. Nalcor estimates the province has received $1 billion from the agreement during its lifetime, while Hydro-Québec has pocketed $22 billion.

But Quebec’s Court of Appeal “upheld a 2014 lower court ruling,” Canadian Business reports, “agreeing that the provincially-owned power utility is under no obligation to revisit the deal as Newfoundland and Labrador has wanted.” The contract’s original negotiators, the Court observed, anticipated that the market price of electricity would vary during its lifetime, but had nonetheless accepted its terms.

Newfoundland previously fought all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada, seeking relief from the contract on other legal grounds, without success. Nalcor, Canadian Business reports, declined to issue a statement about the latest defeat until it had studied the Court’s judgement further.

Rubbing salt in the latest judicial wound for Newfoundland and Labrador: The contract Joey Smallwood agreed to in 1969 will renew automatically on September 1 for another 25 years. So the rejected appeal means the contract’s established terms will now likely continue in force until 2041.

Meanwhile, May called on the federal government to spend “billions of dollars to get out of a bad project” at Muskrat Falls. The MP for Saanich-Gulf Islands, BC urged Ottawa to reject Newfoundland and Labrador’s request for additional loan guarantees to cover a 54% increase in the cost of the project—now due to reach full power two years behind schedule in 2020—to $11.4 billion.

Last month, Nalcor CEO Stan Marshall admitted to CBC News that “Muskrat Falls was not the right choice for the province.” But he rejected abandoning the half-built dam and generating complex. “If we halted this project, we would have spent $6.7 billion, and would have to spend billions more to settle claims and bring the project to some conclusion. And we would not have a source of power.”

Nalcor has also signed a contract to supply free electricity for 35 years to the builder of a subsea interconnection beneath the Strait of Belle Isle to deliver Labrador hydro to the island of Newfoundland. The link is on schedule to be available at the end of 2017.

But May is unconvinced. “Finishing it doesn’t get you ahead in the end, it just gets you deeper in debt,” she said. “Let’s not throw good money after bad.”



in Canada, Climate & Society, Hydropower, Jurisdictions, Legal & Regulatory, Renewable Energy, Sub-National Governments

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

David/flickr
United States

U.S. Supreme Court Expected to Gut Emission Controls as Climate Scientists Petition for Plan B

June 26, 2022
1
pxhere
Environmental Justice

Environmental Racism Bill Passes Second Reading in House of Commons

June 26, 2022
1
Graco/Facebook
Food Security

Soaring Fertilizer Prices Could Deliver ‘Silver Lining’ For Emissions, But Farmers Struggle to Limit Use

June 26, 2022
2

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

The federal government's Cliff Street Power Plant is at the centre of Ottawa's plans to reduce natural gas demand. Photo: PWGSC

EXCLUSIVE: Ontario Regulator Refuses New Pipeline, Tells Enbridge to Plan for Lower Gas Demand

May 30, 2022
5.2k
Jason Woodhead/Flickr

Trans Mountain Pipeline On Track to Lose $600 Million, Parliamentary Budget Officer Finds

June 24, 2022
341
Ben_Kerckx/Pixabay

Plastics Cited as ‘Fossil Industry’s Plan B’ as Guilbeault Announces Partial Ban

June 24, 2022
219
Bruce Reeve/Flickr

Opinion: Ontario’s New ‘Carbon Tax’ Looks Like the One Doug Ford Fought

June 7, 2022
1.6k
eloialferez66/pixnio

Toronto’s New Backyard Homes Will Help Fight Sprawl

June 24, 2022
70
Greg Goebel/Wikimedia Commons

Canadian Pension Board Invests $141M in Chinese Coal Projects, Undercutting Federal Phaseout Policy

July 29, 2020
2.3k

Recent Posts

David/flickr

U.S. Supreme Court Expected to Gut Emission Controls as Climate Scientists Petition for Plan B

June 26, 2022
1
pxhere

Environmental Racism Bill Passes Second Reading in House of Commons

June 26, 2022
1
Graco/Facebook

Soaring Fertilizer Prices Could Deliver ‘Silver Lining’ For Emissions, But Farmers Struggle to Limit Use

June 26, 2022
2
stockvault

Animal Agriculture Could Reduce Future Pandemic Risk, UK Researchers Say

June 26, 2022
1
Gustavo Petro Urrego/flickr

Colombia’s President-Elect Has ‘Ambitious’ Plans to Halt Amazon Deforestation

June 26, 2022
1
Adam E. Moreira/wikimedia commons

Suspend Transit Fares, Not Gas Tax, Climate Advocates Urge Biden

June 26, 2022
1
Next Post
Wesley Fryer/flickr

Demand Flexibility Can Save Grids $10 Billion Per Year…Or Much More

The Energy Mix

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}