• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
BP Predicts Faster Oil and Gas Decline as Clean Energy Spending Hits $1.1T in 2022 January 31, 2023
Canada Needs Oil and Gas Emissions Cap to Hit 2030 Goal: NZAB January 31, 2023
Ecuador’s Amazon Drilling Plan Shows Need for Fossil Non-Proliferation Treaty January 31, 2023
Rainforest Carbon Credits from World’s Biggest Provider are ‘Largely Worthless’, Investigation Finds January 31, 2023
Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing January 23, 2023
Next
Prev

Quebec Court, Elizabeth May Pose Double NL Hydro Challenge

August 4, 2016
Reading time: 3 minutes

Martin Lopatka/Flickr

Martin Lopatka/Flickr

 
Martin Lopatka/Flickr
Martin Lopatka/Flickr

With low crude prices taking the air out of Newfoundland and Labrador’s offshore oil industry, an out-of-province court and a cross-country MP have put headwinds in the way of its hopes for more revenue from hydroelectricity exports.

First, the Quebec Court of Appeal upheld the strict terms of a contract negotiated nearly half a century ago by the province’s first post-Confederation premier for the sale of power from the 5.4-GW Churchill Falls generating station in Labrador. Then Green Party leader and B.C. MP Elizabeth May called on the Liberal government to rescind loan guarantees its Conservative predecessor issued in 2012 to the province’s Crown utility, Nalcor Energy, to build the troubled 824-MW hydro project at Muskrat Falls.

  • Concise headlines. Original content. Timely news and views from a select group of opinion leaders. Special extras.
  • Everything you need, nothing you don’t.
  • The Weekender: The climate news you need.
New!
Subscribe

The contract Premier Joey Smallwood signed in 1969 has been a source of regret for most of his successors since. Newfoundland has long cried foul over its contract with Hydro-Québec, under which the latter buys Churchill Falls electricity at the provincial border at a contract-limited price and sells it to utilities in the northeastern U.S. at a significant profit. Nalcor estimates the province has received $1 billion from the agreement during its lifetime, while Hydro-Québec has pocketed $22 billion.

But Quebec’s Court of Appeal “upheld a 2014 lower court ruling,” Canadian Business reports, “agreeing that the provincially-owned power utility is under no obligation to revisit the deal as Newfoundland and Labrador has wanted.” The contract’s original negotiators, the Court observed, anticipated that the market price of electricity would vary during its lifetime, but had nonetheless accepted its terms.

Newfoundland previously fought all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada, seeking relief from the contract on other legal grounds, without success. Nalcor, Canadian Business reports, declined to issue a statement about the latest defeat until it had studied the Court’s judgement further.

Rubbing salt in the latest judicial wound for Newfoundland and Labrador: The contract Joey Smallwood agreed to in 1969 will renew automatically on September 1 for another 25 years. So the rejected appeal means the contract’s established terms will now likely continue in force until 2041.

Meanwhile, May called on the federal government to spend “billions of dollars to get out of a bad project” at Muskrat Falls. The MP for Saanich-Gulf Islands, BC urged Ottawa to reject Newfoundland and Labrador’s request for additional loan guarantees to cover a 54% increase in the cost of the project—now due to reach full power two years behind schedule in 2020—to $11.4 billion.

Last month, Nalcor CEO Stan Marshall admitted to CBC News that “Muskrat Falls was not the right choice for the province.” But he rejected abandoning the half-built dam and generating complex. “If we halted this project, we would have spent $6.7 billion, and would have to spend billions more to settle claims and bring the project to some conclusion. And we would not have a source of power.”

Nalcor has also signed a contract to supply free electricity for 35 years to the builder of a subsea interconnection beneath the Strait of Belle Isle to deliver Labrador hydro to the island of Newfoundland. The link is on schedule to be available at the end of 2017.

But May is unconvinced. “Finishing it doesn’t get you ahead in the end, it just gets you deeper in debt,” she said. “Let’s not throw good money after bad.”



in Canada, Climate & Society, Hydropower, Jurisdictions, Legal & Regulatory, Renewable Energy, Sub-National Governments

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Mike Mozart/Flickr
Ending Emissions

BP Predicts Faster Oil and Gas Decline as Clean Energy Spending Hits $1.1T in 2022

January 31, 2023
313
Gina Dittmer/PublicDomainPictures
Canada

Canada Needs Oil and Gas Emissions Cap to Hit 2030 Goal: NZAB

January 31, 2023
191
CONFENIAE
Ending Emissions

Ecuador’s Amazon Drilling Plan Shows Need for Fossil Non-Proliferation Treaty

January 31, 2023
58

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Mike Mozart/Flickr

BP Predicts Faster Oil and Gas Decline as Clean Energy Spending Hits $1.1T in 2022

January 31, 2023
313
Gina Dittmer/PublicDomainPictures

Canada Needs Oil and Gas Emissions Cap to Hit 2030 Goal: NZAB

January 31, 2023
191
Doc Searls/Twitter

Guilbeault Could Intervene on Ontario Greenbelt Development

January 31, 2023
125
Ken Teegardin www.SeniorLiving.Org/flickr

Virtual Power Plants Hit an ‘Inflection Point’

January 31, 2023
115
RL0919/wikimedia commons

Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing

January 23, 2023
2.4k
/snappy goat

Rainforest Carbon Credits from World’s Biggest Provider are ‘Largely Worthless’, Investigation Finds

January 31, 2023
92

Recent Posts

CONFENIAE

Ecuador’s Amazon Drilling Plan Shows Need for Fossil Non-Proliferation Treaty

January 31, 2023
58
Victorgrigas/wikimedia commons

World Bank Climate Reforms Too ‘Timid and Slow,’ Critics Warn

January 31, 2023
41
United Nations

Salvage of $20B ‘Floating Time Bomb’ Delayed by Rising Cost of Oil Tankers

January 27, 2023
120
@tongbingxue/Twitter

Extreme Warming Ahead Even as Worst-Case Scenarios Grow ‘Obsolete’

January 23, 2023
340
Rachel Notley/Facebook

Notley Scorches Federal Just Transition Bill as Fossil CEO Calls for Oilsands Boom

January 23, 2023
312
EcoAnalytics

Albertans Want a Just Transition, Despite Premier’s Grumbling

January 23, 2023
321
Next Post
Wesley Fryer/flickr

Demand Flexibility Can Save Grids $10 Billion Per Year…Or Much More

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}