• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing January 23, 2023
Extreme Warming Ahead Even as Worst-Case Scenarios Grow ‘Obsolete’ January 23, 2023
Notley Scorches Federal Just Transition Bill as Fossil CEO Calls for Oilsands Boom January 23, 2023
IRON OXIDE: New Battery Brings Long-Duration Storage to Grids, 750 Jobs to West Virginia January 23, 2023
BREAKING: GFANZ Banks, Investors Pour Hundreds of Billions into Fossil Fuels January 17, 2023
Next
Prev

Grid Rate Structures Could Produce ‘Train Wreck’ for U.S. Solar

July 12, 2016
Reading time: 3 minutes

ChristofferRiemer/Wikimedia Commons

ChristofferRiemer/Wikimedia Commons

 
ChristofferRiemer/Wikimedia Commons
ChristofferRiemer/Wikimedia Commons

The outgoing head of the largest utility-scale solar developer in the United States is offering some parting shots that weren’t what rivals focused on residential installations wanted to hear.

Jim Hughes, who stepped down on June 30 as CEO of First Solar, believes the complicated—and controversial—rate structures that utilities offer to residential solar customers who also connect to their grids are leading to a “train wreck” for the sector.

  • Be among the first to read The Energy Mix Weekender
  • A brand new weekly digest containing exclusive and essential climate stories from around the world.
  • The Weekender:The climate news you need.
New!
Subscribe

U.S. solar markets have been roiled in recent months by state-level changes to the tariff structures that utilities are allowed to apply when providing power to PV-equipped homes while the sun is down, and what they must pay to those same homes when their sunlit panels are sending power back to the grid. Nevada and other states have rolled back net metering provisions that obliged utilities to purchase residential solar power at full retail, rather than wholesale, rates. Regulators are also allowing utilities to add “demand charges” to residential power bills, reflecting the incremental cost of supplying the peak energy a customer consumes during a billing cycle.

The moves have sharply reduced business for solar installers in several states, and prompted a drop in share prices for publicly-traded solar companies—prompting fierce opposition from the sector. But Hughes calls the changes unavoidable, and even wise.

“A rate structure that facilitates short-term economics and isn’t long-term sustainable for the grid, the economy, and the system as a whole doesn’t create a sustainable industry—it creates a train wreck,” Hughes told the recent Edison Electric Institute’s annual convention, Greentech Media reports.

“I’ve been saying that retail-rate net metering is not economically realistic. It’s something that’s going to bankrupt the entire system,” Hughes added in a follow-up interview. “The beneficiaries of net metering are well-off suburban companies. The people burdened by net metering are small businesses, multi-family tenants, and those who don’t own their homes or don’t have adequate credit. Early on, I identified that as one of the big problems with net metering, because at some point that was going to become politically untenable. You’ve seen that happen.

“If the residential solar industry thinks they’re going to force the industry to pay them uneconomic retail net metering rates, to whatever level of penetration they want, it’s not going to happen.”

Hughes predicted photovoltaic power will be available in the United States at a generated cost of US$1 per watt by 2018. While he foresees distributed generation (facilities smaller than 5 MW) accounting for 40% of future solar nameplate capacity, it will contribute only 30% of actual generation, due to the higher efficiency of the kind of concentrated, utility-scale array his former company produces.

Residential rooftop solar panels “will be a very small percentage” of the total generation mix, he added: “I really think we’re going to see the dominance of community solar, as opposed to residential. People don’t necessarily have passion to put solar on their roof; it’s a passion for clean power. That’s why I’ve been saying for years [that] community solar will be so powerful.”

But much depends on rate structures that accurately reflect the cost and value of solar generation. “The whole key to me,” he told Greentech, “is to focus on passing through what the true economics are.”

First Solar currently operates 3,177 MW of photovoltaic generation, with 2,397 MW under development, about 10% of all solar projects now under way in the United States, Greentech reports.



in Clean Electricity Grid, Climate & Society, Community Climate Finance, Demand & Distribution, Jurisdictions, Legal & Regulatory, Renewable Energy, Solar, United States

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

United Nations
Air & Marine

Salvage of $20B ‘Floating Time Bomb’ Delayed by Rising Cost of Oil Tankers

January 27, 2023
35
RL0919/wikimedia commons
Finance & Investment

Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing

January 23, 2023
2.1k
@tongbingxue/Twitter
Ending Emissions

Extreme Warming Ahead Even as Worst-Case Scenarios Grow ‘Obsolete’

January 23, 2023
279

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

RL0919/wikimedia commons

Danske Bank Quits New Fossil Fuel Financing

January 23, 2023
2.1k
EcoAnalytics

Albertans Want a Just Transition, Despite Premier’s Grumbling

January 23, 2023
224
United Nations

Salvage of $20B ‘Floating Time Bomb’ Delayed by Rising Cost of Oil Tankers

January 27, 2023
35
@tongbingxue/Twitter

Extreme Warming Ahead Even as Worst-Case Scenarios Grow ‘Obsolete’

January 23, 2023
279
Rachel Notley/Facebook

Notley Scorches Federal Just Transition Bill as Fossil CEO Calls for Oilsands Boom

January 23, 2023
263
James Vincent Wardhaugh/flickr

Canada Sidelines Ontario’s Ring of Fire, Approves Separate Mining Project

December 4, 2022
382

Recent Posts

Weirton, WV by Jon Dawson/flickr

IRON OXIDE: New Battery Brings Long-Duration Storage to Grids, 750 Jobs to West Virginia

January 23, 2023
502
Sergio Boscaino/flickr

Dubai Mulls Quitting C40 Cities Over ‘Costly’ Climate Target

January 24, 2023
86
hangela/pixabay

New UK Coal Mine Faces Two Legal Challenges

January 24, 2023
44

Gas Stoves Enter U.S. Climate Culture War, Become ‘Bellwether’ for Industry

January 22, 2023
74
Jeff Hitchcock/flickr.

BREAKING: GFANZ Banks, Investors Pour Hundreds of Billions into Fossil Fuels

January 23, 2023
495

Exxon Had the Right Global Warming Numbers Through Decades of Denial: Study

January 17, 2023
223
Next Post

Gold’s hidden climate footprint

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}