• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
13 Canadian Fossils Linked to Massive Losses in Western Wildfires May 27, 2023
‘Remarkable Rebuke’: 130 U.S, EU Legislators Ask UN to Ditch Fossil CEO as COP 28 Chair May 23, 2023
Ontario Overrules Cities to Push Gas Plant Expansions May 23, 2023
Climate Concerns Drive Job Choices for 40% of Workers Under 40 May 23, 2023
PEROVSKITES: Qcells Plans First Production Line for ‘Miracle’ Solar Cell May 23, 2023
Next
Prev

EPA Methane Studies Face Claim of ‘Scientific Fraud’

June 10, 2016
Reading time: 3 minutes

Joshua Doubek/Wikipedia

Joshua Doubek/Wikipedia

 
Joshua Doubek/Wikipedia
Joshua Doubek/Wikipedia

An anti-fracking and energy justice group in North Carolina is alleging scientific fraud in a complaint to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), claiming a key official ignored a whistleblower’s warnings about the instruments it used to calculate methane leaks from the natural gas industry.

“What we are alleging is a cover-up, scientific fraud, and possibly criminal misconduct by a high-ranking EPA official and perhaps others,” said NC Warn Executive Director Jim Warren. “Due to this cover-up, humanity has been robbed of several years during a critical period of the climate crisis where we should have been working cooperatively to greatly reduce emissions.”

  • The climate news you need. Subscribe now to our engaging new weekly digest.
  • You’ll receive exclusive, never-before-seen-content, distilled and delivered to your inbox every weekend.
  • The Weekender: Succinct, solutions-focused, and designed with the discerning reader in mind.
Subscribe

The debate turns on methane studies released in 2013 and 2014 by the U.S. Environmental Defense Fund as part of a 16-study, US$18-million research project to assess methane emissions from natural gas fracking. “The studies’ findings have been used by the natural gas industry to argue that methane leaks are low,” the Los Angeles Times reports.

The 68-page complaint alleges that David Allen, an engineering professor at the University of Texas who chaired the EPA’s external Science Advisory Board, “should have corrected studies about methane leaks after the equipment used for the reports was proved faulty,” the Times notes. “NC Warn’s conclusion is largely based on efforts by whistleblower Touché Howard, an engineer who invented the technology used to measure methane leaks. Howard identified a flaw in the technology that showed Allen’s studies could be underreporting emissions as much as 100-fold.”

Allen replied that the researchers used various instruments and considered their findings sound. “Our study team strongly asserts that the instrument we used and the measurements we made were not impacted by the claimed failure,” he said in a statement released by the university.

InsideClimate News observes that the arguments behind this story have been going on for some time. “EDF, one of the largest national green groups, has advocated for tougher regulations of methane emissions, a hotly debated climate policy issue,” ICN notes. “But it has also been criticized for working closely with the industry in conducting the studies.”

Howard, who has since retired, said the alleged flaws in the EPA’s reporting could be relevant to the disastrous Aliso Canyon methane leak, and to other natural gas projects across the U.S. “The equipment in question has been used at all stages of natural gas processing, transmission, storage, and distribution to determine methane emissions,” the Times writes, citing NC Warn.

ICN’s Phil McKenna notes that “this technical debate has been fully aired in peer reviewed publications. Neither side has budged; so an inspector general’s report might help resolve the technical questions, as well as settling whether there was any impropriety.”

“What we are alleging is a cover-up, scientific fraud, and possibly criminal misconduct by a high-ranking EPA official and perhaps others,” said NC Warn Executive Director Jim Warren. “Due to this cover-up, humanity has been robbed of several years during a critical period of the climate crisis where we should have been working cooperatively to greatly reduce emissions.”

The debate turns on methane studies released in 2013 and 2014 by the U.S. Environmental Defense Fund as part of a 16-study, US$18-million research project to assess methane emissions from natural gas fracking. “The studies’ findings have been used by the natural gas industry to argue that methane leaks are low,” the Los Angeles Times reports.

The 68-page complaint alleges that David Allen, an engineering professor at the University of Texas who chaired the EPA’s external Science Advisory Board, “should have corrected studies about methane leaks after the equipment used for the reports was proved faulty,” the Times notes. “NC Warn’s conclusion is largely based on efforts by whistleblower Touché Howard, an engineer who invented the technology used to measure methane leaks. Howard identified a flaw in the technology that showed Allen’s studies could be underreporting emissions as much as 100-fold.”

Allen replied that the researchers used various instruments and considered their findings sound. “Our study team strongly asserts that the instrument we used and the measurements we made were not impacted by the claimed failure,” he said in a statement released by the university.

InsideClimate News observes that the arguments behind this story have been going on for some time. “EDF, one of the largest national green groups, has advocated for tougher regulations of methane emissions, a hotly debated climate policy issue,” ICN notes. “But it has also been criticized for working closely with the industry in conducting the studies.”

Howard, who has since retired, said the alleged flaws in the EPA’s reporting could be relevant to the disastrous Aliso Canyon methane leak, and to other natural gas projects across the U.S. “The equipment in question has been used at all stages of natural gas processing, transmission, storage, and distribution to determine methane emissions,” the Times writes, citing NC Warn.

ICN’s Phil McKenna notes that “this technical debate has been fully aired in peer reviewed publications. Neither side has budged; so an inspector general’s report might help resolve the technical questions, as well as settling whether there was any impropriety.”



in Climate & Society, Energy Politics, Fossil Fuels, Jurisdictions, Legal & Regulatory, Methane, Shale & Fracking, United States

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Martin Davis/Facebook
Carbon Levels & Measurement

13 Canadian Fossils Linked to Massive Losses in Western Wildfires

May 28, 2023
306
FMSC/Flickr
Finance & Investment

Waive Debt to Unlock Urgently Needed Adaptation Funds, Researchers Urge

May 27, 2023
22
Arctic Circle/flickr
COP Conferences

‘Remarkable Rebuke’: 130 U.S, EU Legislators Ask UN to Ditch Fossil CEO as COP 28 Chair

May 23, 2023
397

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Martin Davis/Facebook

13 Canadian Fossils Linked to Massive Losses in Western Wildfires

May 28, 2023
306
pixabay

Anti-Mob Laws to Prosecute Fossils, Kudos for Calgary, 113M Climate Refugees, Orcas Fight Back, and a Climate Dictionary

May 24, 2023
130
Inspiration 4 Photos/flickr

Cooling Upper Atmosphere Has Scientists ‘Very Worried’

May 23, 2023
269
University of Oxford Press Office/flickr

PEROVSKITES: Qcells Plans First Production Line for ‘Miracle’ Solar Cell

May 23, 2023
434
Arctic Circle/flickr

‘Remarkable Rebuke’: 130 U.S, EU Legislators Ask UN to Ditch Fossil CEO as COP 28 Chair

May 23, 2023
397
François GOGLINS/wikimedia commons

Corrosion Problem Shutters Half of France’s Nuclear Reactors

August 2, 2022
3.7k

Recent Posts

FMSC/Flickr

Waive Debt to Unlock Urgently Needed Adaptation Funds, Researchers Urge

May 27, 2023
22
Jon Sullivan/flickr

Ontario Overrules Cities to Push Gas Plant Expansions

May 23, 2023
872
Andrés Nieto Porras/wikimedia commons

‘Carbon Neutral’, ‘Net-Zero’ Claims Face Global Greenwash Crackdown

May 23, 2023
209
Activités culturelles UdeM/Flickr

Climate Concerns Drive Job Choices for 40% of Workers Under 40

May 23, 2023
160
peellden/Wikimedia Commons

Scientists Sound Alarm on Methane Emissions, Habitat Hazards at U.S. Hydro Dams

May 23, 2023
155
nakashi/flickr

Tokyo Residents Rally to Protect Trees, Stop Skyscrapers in Iconic Urban Park

May 21, 2023
483
Next Post

Bionic leaf can fuel energy revolution

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}