• About
    • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Climate News Network Archive
  • Contact
The climate news that makes a difference.
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities
  FEATURED
Is Equinor’s Bay du Nord ‘Delay’ a Cancellation in Slow Motion? June 1, 2023
Analyst Sees Oil and Gas Running Short of Cash as IEA Releases Energy Investment Update May 30, 2023
House of Commons Motion, Senate Bill Urge New Climate Rules for Financial Institutions May 30, 2023
13 Canadian Fossils Linked to Massive Losses in Western Wildfires May 30, 2023
Hamilton Plans Heat Bylaw for Rental Housing May 30, 2023
Next
Prev

Tied U.S. Supreme Court Sets Off Partisan Turmoil

February 17, 2016
Reading time: 3 minutes

skeeze / Pixabay

skeeze / Pixabay

 
White House via Wikipedia
White House via Wikipedia

News of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia’s death sent odds-makers around the globe scrambling to recalculate the probability that the United States would live up to the commitment it made last December at the Paris climate summit.

Just last week, Scalia had participated in a 5-4 vote to put on hold the central plank of that commitment: President Barack Obama’s Clean Power Plan.

  • Be among the first to read The Energy Mix Weekender
  • A brand new weekly digest containing exclusive and essential climate stories from around the world.
  • The Weekender:The climate news you need.
Subscribe

Energy and climate sector speculation quickly focused on what Scalia’s death meant for the future of the plan, aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions from U.S. electricity production, still largely coal-fueled. But that subject was immediately overtaken by an even larger one: how would the timing of Scalia’s death, nine months away from a presidential election, affect its outcome—and vice versa?

“Scalia’s Death May Have Saved the Planet” crowed one premature headline. More sober analysts ran a gamut from, ‘it helps, maybe, a little,’ through ‘it depends,’ to ‘it doesn’t matter.’

As Robinson Meyer reminded readers in the Atlantic, the Court’s stay of the Clean Power Plan was not straightforward. What it in fact ordered was “that the Clean Power Plan could only enter into force after the Court itself ruled; or if the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals heard its case (as it is scheduled to do this summer) and the Supreme Court declined to hear the inevitable appeal.”

That means the high court’s decision left the lawsuit launched by fossil fuel industry groups and 27 U.S. states against the Environmental Protection Agency, which is implementing the Clean Power Plan, alive before the Federal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. Its bench is regarded as pro-environment, and likely to uphold the plan. Its opponents are expected then to appeal that verdict to the Supreme Court.

At that point, the Justices will have the option of hearing the appeal or not, and if they allow it, to judge the case. That’s where Scalia’s absence may change the outcome. With Scalia, it’s more likely the Court would have heard an appeal of a pro-CPP ruling, and perhaps also more likely to strike it down.

In that case, several observers (not all) worried that the United States’ inability to meet its climate commitments could prove to be “the proverbial string which causes Paris to unravel,” as one expert told The New York Times.

Scalia’s death, reducing the Court’s panel to eight judges, complicates the odds-making. If a lower court judgment and appeal arrive at the Supreme Court while its panel is still reduced to eight justices, Scalia’s absence may make the difference between an appeal being heard, or not. In cases where a vote to hear a case splits 4-4, the original verdict is automatically upheld (although the full court may revisit that on a subsequent appeal).

The timing of Scalia’s departure also leaves open the question of how long the Court may remain short-handed and broadly split on ideological and partisan lines (with Justice Anthony Kennedy something of a swing vote). Obama quickly announced that he would nominate a replacement. But the U.S. Republican Party, including its entire slate of presidential candidates and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), joined ranks to question is right to nominate a Supreme Court judge in his last year in office (though plenty of past presidents have done just that).

Then again, in some views, it may not matter much. Sustainable investing advisor Julie Gorte of Pax World Management in Portsmouth, MA suggested that even with Scalia, the Supremes were never likely to throw the Clean Power Plan out.

“It was the Supreme Court that affirmed that regulating greenhouse gas emissions is covered by the Clean Air Act,” Gorte told the told Colorado-based Public News Service: “For the Supreme Court to really kill the Clean Power Plan would mean that they’d have to reverse an earlier Supreme Court ruling, which they rarely do.”

Continue Reading



in Climate & Society, COP Conferences, Ending Emissions, Energy Politics, Jurisdictions, Legal & Regulatory, United States

The latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox

Subscribe

Related Posts

Equinor
Oil & Gas

Is Equinor’s Bay du Nord ‘Delay’ a Cancellation in Slow Motion?

June 1, 2023
605
Ottawa Renewable Energy Co-op/Facebook
Climate Action / "Blockadia"

‘Hinge Moment’ for Humanity Demands ‘YIMBY’ Mentality: McKibben

June 1, 2023
48
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Notley
Energy Politics

Notley Would Have Backed Carbon Capture Subsidies, Smith Less Certain: Ex-Pipeline Exec

June 1, 2023
76

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Trending Stories

Equinor

Is Equinor’s Bay du Nord ‘Delay’ a Cancellation in Slow Motion?

June 1, 2023
605
/Piqusels

Analyst Sees Oil and Gas Running Short of Cash as IEA Releases Energy Investment Update

May 31, 2023
603
Neal Alderson/Twitter

Out-of-Control Wildfire Burns Homes, Forces Evacuations Outside Halifax

May 29, 2023
2.6k
York Region/flickr

Hamilton Plans Heat Bylaw for Rental Housing

May 31, 2023
483
Ryan Turnbull/Facebook

House of Commons Motion, Senate Bill Urge New Climate Rules for Financial Institutions

May 30, 2023
236
Ottawa Renewable Energy Co-op/Facebook

‘Hinge Moment’ for Humanity Demands ‘YIMBY’ Mentality: McKibben

June 1, 2023
48

Recent Posts

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Notley

Notley Would Have Backed Carbon Capture Subsidies, Smith Less Certain: Ex-Pipeline Exec

June 1, 2023
76
Equinor

Equinor Delays Bay du Nord Offshore Oil Project, Blames ‘Volatile’ Markets

May 31, 2023
108
David Dodge, Green Energy Futures/flickr

Clean Energy to Add 700,000 New Jobs by 2050, with Alberta in the Lead

May 30, 2023
205
Martin Davis/Facebook

13 Canadian Fossils Linked to Massive Losses in Western Wildfires

May 30, 2023
596
David/flickr

Supreme Court Decision Undercuts U.S. Clean Water Act

May 30, 2023
79
Nicolas Rénac/Flickr

Climate Change to Cut Coffee Growing Lands by Over 50%

May 30, 2023
79
Next Post

Carbon capture could be costly and risky

The Energy Mix - The climate news you need

Copyright 2023 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_withtagline
No Result
View All Result
  • Canada
  • UK & Europe
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Ending Emissions
  • Community Climate Finance
  • Clean Electricity Grid
  • Cities & Communities

Copyright 2022 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}