The Energy Mix
Subscribe
Donate
  • Topics
    • Buildings & Infrastructure
    • Climate Equity & Justice
      • Energy Poverty
      • Indigenous Rights & Reconciliation
    • Climate Finance
      • Community Climate Finance
      • Finance & Investment
      • Insurance & Liability
      • Subsidies
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought & Wildfires
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Emissions
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Methane
    • Energy
      • Renewables
      • Fossil Fuels
      • Hydrogen
      • Nuclear
      • Batteries & Storage
      • Energy Efficiency
      • Power Grids
    • Food & Agriculture
    • Industry
      • Data Centres & Tech
      • Critical Minerals & Mining
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Policy & Politics
      • Carbon Pricing
      • COP Conferences
      • Elections
      • Energy Politics
      • International Security & War
      • Legal & Regulatory
    • Research & Innovation
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Research & Development
    • Society & Culture
      • Climate Action
      • Mis/Disinformation & Greenwashing
      • Jobs & Training
      • Leisure & Recreation
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Transportation & Mobility
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Shipping & Aviation
      • Transit
      • Walking, Biking & Micromobility
  • Regions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Canada
    • International
    • Mexico & the Caribbean
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Subnational
    • United States
    • UK & Europe
  • Special Coverage
    • The Weekender
    • IEA2026
    • Canada’s Major Projects Office
    • Hidden Wonder Valley
    • COP30
    • Cities & Communities
    • Heat & Power
    • Community Climate Finance
  • More Resources
    • Climate Glossary
    • What If We Changed the Conversation on Climate Change?
    • Eco-Anxiety
  • About
  • Contact
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Topics
    • Buildings & Infrastructure
    • Climate Equity & Justice
      • Energy Poverty
      • Indigenous Rights & Reconciliation
    • Climate Finance
      • Community Climate Finance
      • Finance & Investment
      • Insurance & Liability
      • Subsidies
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought & Wildfires
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Emissions
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Methane
    • Energy
      • Renewables
      • Fossil Fuels
      • Hydrogen
      • Nuclear
      • Batteries & Storage
      • Energy Efficiency
      • Power Grids
    • Food & Agriculture
    • Industry
      • Data Centres & Tech
      • Critical Minerals & Mining
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Policy & Politics
      • Carbon Pricing
      • COP Conferences
      • Elections
      • Energy Politics
      • International Security & War
      • Legal & Regulatory
    • Research & Innovation
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Research & Development
    • Society & Culture
      • Climate Action
      • Mis/Disinformation & Greenwashing
      • Jobs & Training
      • Leisure & Recreation
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Transportation & Mobility
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Shipping & Aviation
      • Transit
      • Walking, Biking & Micromobility
  • Regions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Canada
    • International
    • Mexico & the Caribbean
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Subnational
    • United States
    • UK & Europe
  • Special Coverage
    • The Weekender
    • IEA2026
    • Canada’s Major Projects Office
    • Hidden Wonder Valley
    • COP30
    • Cities & Communities
    • Heat & Power
    • Community Climate Finance
  • More Resources
    • Climate Glossary
    • What If We Changed the Conversation on Climate Change?
    • Eco-Anxiety
  • About
  • Contact
Subscribe
Donate
The Energy Mix
Subscribe

2/3 of Albertans Say ‘YIMBY’ to More Renewables in Their Communities

May 31, 2026
Reading time: 4 minutes
Author: The Energy Mix staff
Full Story: The Energy Mix

Métis Nation of Alberta/YouTube

Métis Nation of Alberta/YouTube

May 31, 2026 – Two-thirds of Albertans say they want more wind and solar developed in or near their communities, concludes a new poll released in late May by the Business Renewables Centre-Canada.

Nearly identical numbers of respondents agreed or strongly agreed on two points: that they wanted to see more wind or solar projects developed “in or near the community where I live,” and that the Alberta government “should be doing more to encourage the development of emission free sources, such as wind and solar, in the province,” BRC-C reports.

Support for renewables projects rises to 75% among 18- to 34-year-olds, the poll found. “Even in rural Alberta, where most renewable projects are actually built, a majority, 59%, say they want to see more wind and solar developed near where they live,” BRC-C writes.

The poll by Winnipeg-based Probe Research talked to a representative sample of 1,484 Alberta adults between April 27 and May 6. It has a margin for error of ±2.5%, 19 times out of 20.

Get the latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox.

Subscribe Today

View our latest digests

“The story that Albertans don’t want renewable energy, especially in rural communities, just doesn’t hold up against this data,” BRC-C Director Jorden Dye said in a release. “A majority of rural Albertans say they want more wind and solar developed near where they live. These are the communities that would actually host renewable projects, and they’re excited to see more.”

Business Renewables Centre-Canada

Across Canada, corporate buyers “are actively looking for places to source clean power, and Alberta has enormous potential to meet that demand,” Dye added. “Polling like this matters because it tells developers, investors, and the companies looking to sign long-term renewable energy agreements that the communities they’d be working with are onboard. Public support is one piece of the puzzle. Now we need the policy to match it.”

In a blog post accompanying the release, Dye and BRC-C Senior Communications Lead Jean Todea say majority support in rural communities is particularly important. “Grid-scale wind and solar projects, like the ones Alberta urgently needs, are not built in city centres,” they write. “They’re built in and close to rural and small-town Alberta—where the sun and the wind resources are most plentiful.”

And “contrary to some outdated presumptions about rural attitudes, those communities are, for the most part, open to hosting more! The NIMBY (“not in my backyard”) narrative that often gets attached to rural Alberta simply doesn’t hold up against the data.”

The polling data land almost three years after Alberta introduced a punishing renewable energy moratorium and subsequent series of restrictive regulations that had the province almost completely stalling out on new project development by 2025, even though Alberta led the country in renewables deployment before the moratorium took effect. By August last year, the restrictions had cost the province 10.7 gigawatts of new renewable capacity, equivalent to 109% of its average power demand 89% of its peak demand.

In 2024, BRC-C calculated the lost municipal tax revenue due to solar and wind cancellations at $91 million per year spread across 53 cancelled projects, some of them in cash-starved rural communities where fossil companies have steadfastly refused to pay their taxes.

Alberta Technology & Innovation Minister Nate Glubish tried to challenge the numbers in his private Substack newsletter, contending that “the cancelled projects opponents are mourning were never real investments. They were speculative queue positions. Press releases and pipe dreams, not financed, shovel-ready developments.”

But BRC-C’s parent organization, the Calgary-based Pembina Institute, told a different story in a report that called for Alberta and Canada to unwind the province’s restrictions on renewables as part of negotiations around the federal-provincial memorandum of understanding (MOU) signed last fall by Prime Minister Mark Carney and Premier Danielle Smith.

“As ever when assessing queue data, some level of cancellations is to be expected—not all projects make it all the way from joining the queue to being built, and this naturally happens for a host of reasons in all jurisdictions,” the Pembina report stated. “However, Alberta is unique in that its renewables project development queue continues to empty faster than it is filling, leading to a net reduction in size for the second year in a row. As highlighted in our 2025 analysis, this is not something we are seeing in leading jurisdictions, such as in Texas and South Australia.”

This story is part of The Energy Mix’s partnership with Small Change Fund.







in Alberta, Canada, Cities & Communities, Energy Politics, Heat & Power, Legal & Regulatory, Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion, Power Grids, Solar, Wind

Trending Stories

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith and Minister of Technology and Innovation Nate Glubish introduced, at a news conference in Edmonton on December 4, 2024, the province’s new data strategy. (photography by Chris Schwarz/Government of Alberta)
Data Centres & Tech

Smith Tells Albertans to ‘Lock In’ Power Prices Before Meta Data Centre Joins Grid

September 1, 2026
36.1k
Jay Phagan/flickr
Pipelines / Rail Transport

West Coast Pipeline Won’t Recoup Its $43.7B Cost as Global Oil Demand Weakens

September 2, 2026
1.7k
@5thAdmiralFrank
/Twitter
Carbon Levels & Measurement

‘Call to Apathy, Not to Arms’ as UN Warns Climate Overshoot Is Inevitable, Downplays Fossil Phaseout

September 3, 2026
345

Comments 3

  1. Waldo Mcpherson. says:
    3 months ago

    I personally want more renewable power sources, and support them because as they usually need oil to lubricate parts, or drive the parts to and fro and are good for the environment. But 1484 people is 0.02968% of Albertans. Claiming the options of less than one tenth of a percentage represents the population is absurd.

    Reply
    • Mitchell Beer says:
      3 months ago

      Thanks, Waldo. As an FYI, short of the occasional national census, opinion polls on all issues (and from all sides of the spectrum) are based on the same kind of methodology. One part of responsibly reporting them is to be clear about the methods used.

      Reply
  2. Alfredo Louro says:
    3 months ago

    You’d be surprised. The sample size is perfectly appropriate. The key is that the demographics of the sam0le is representative of the population.
    Nobody is going to pay for a poll that provides no information.
    The fact is that the UCP does not represent the interests of the population, but of the oil and gas shareholders. Who by the way are mostly not Canadian, never mind Albertan.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Get the latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox.

Subscribe Today

Related Articles

Olympic Athletes Launch Second Campaign to Ban Future Fossil Sponsorship

Olympic Athletes Launch Second Campaign to Ban Future Fossil Sponsorship

February 11, 2026
Phantom Public Comments Threaten Ohio Solar Farm

Phantom Public Comments Threaten Ohio Solar Farm

February 10, 2026
Washington Post Scales Back Climate Team as Bezos Caves to Trump

Washington Post Scales Back Climate Team as Bezos Caves to Trump

February 5, 2026

The Better Ideas Show: How the Clean Climate Economy Protects Canada’s Sovereignty

by Mitchell Beer
August 30, 2026

…

Follow Us

2/3 of Albertans Say ‘YIMBY’ to More Renewables in Their Communities

May 31, 2026
Reading time: 4 minutes
Author: The Energy Mix staff
Full Story: The Energy Mix

Métis Nation of Alberta/YouTube

Métis Nation of Alberta/YouTube

May 31, 2026 – Two-thirds of Albertans say they want more wind and solar developed in or near their communities, concludes a new poll released in late May by the Business Renewables Centre-Canada.

Nearly identical numbers of respondents agreed or strongly agreed on two points: that they wanted to see more wind or solar projects developed “in or near the community where I live,” and that the Alberta government “should be doing more to encourage the development of emission free sources, such as wind and solar, in the province,” BRC-C reports.

Support for renewables projects rises to 75% among 18- to 34-year-olds, the poll found. “Even in rural Alberta, where most renewable projects are actually built, a majority, 59%, say they want to see more wind and solar developed near where they live,” BRC-C writes.

The poll by Winnipeg-based Probe Research talked to a representative sample of 1,484 Alberta adults between April 27 and May 6. It has a margin for error of ±2.5%, 19 times out of 20.

Get the latest climate news and analysis, direct to your inbox.

Subscribe Today

View our latest digests

“The story that Albertans don’t want renewable energy, especially in rural communities, just doesn’t hold up against this data,” BRC-C Director Jorden Dye said in a release. “A majority of rural Albertans say they want more wind and solar developed near where they live. These are the communities that would actually host renewable projects, and they’re excited to see more.”

Business Renewables Centre-Canada

Across Canada, corporate buyers “are actively looking for places to source clean power, and Alberta has enormous potential to meet that demand,” Dye added. “Polling like this matters because it tells developers, investors, and the companies looking to sign long-term renewable energy agreements that the communities they’d be working with are onboard. Public support is one piece of the puzzle. Now we need the policy to match it.”

In a blog post accompanying the release, Dye and BRC-C Senior Communications Lead Jean Todea say majority support in rural communities is particularly important. “Grid-scale wind and solar projects, like the ones Alberta urgently needs, are not built in city centres,” they write. “They’re built in and close to rural and small-town Alberta—where the sun and the wind resources are most plentiful.”

And “contrary to some outdated presumptions about rural attitudes, those communities are, for the most part, open to hosting more! The NIMBY (“not in my backyard”) narrative that often gets attached to rural Alberta simply doesn’t hold up against the data.”

The polling data land almost three years after Alberta introduced a punishing renewable energy moratorium and subsequent series of restrictive regulations that had the province almost completely stalling out on new project development by 2025, even though Alberta led the country in renewables deployment before the moratorium took effect. By August last year, the restrictions had cost the province 10.7 gigawatts of new renewable capacity, equivalent to 109% of its average power demand 89% of its peak demand.

In 2024, BRC-C calculated the lost municipal tax revenue due to solar and wind cancellations at $91 million per year spread across 53 cancelled projects, some of them in cash-starved rural communities where fossil companies have steadfastly refused to pay their taxes.

Alberta Technology & Innovation Minister Nate Glubish tried to challenge the numbers in his private Substack newsletter, contending that “the cancelled projects opponents are mourning were never real investments. They were speculative queue positions. Press releases and pipe dreams, not financed, shovel-ready developments.”

But BRC-C’s parent organization, the Calgary-based Pembina Institute, told a different story in a report that called for Alberta and Canada to unwind the province’s restrictions on renewables as part of negotiations around the federal-provincial memorandum of understanding (MOU) signed last fall by Prime Minister Mark Carney and Premier Danielle Smith.

“As ever when assessing queue data, some level of cancellations is to be expected—not all projects make it all the way from joining the queue to being built, and this naturally happens for a host of reasons in all jurisdictions,” the Pembina report stated. “However, Alberta is unique in that its renewables project development queue continues to empty faster than it is filling, leading to a net reduction in size for the second year in a row. As highlighted in our 2025 analysis, this is not something we are seeing in leading jurisdictions, such as in Texas and South Australia.”

This story is part of The Energy Mix’s partnership with Small Change Fund.







in Alberta, Canada, Cities & Communities, Energy Politics, Heat & Power, Legal & Regulatory, Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion, Power Grids, Solar, Wind

Comments 3

  1. Waldo Mcpherson. says:
    3 months ago

    I personally want more renewable power sources, and support them because as they usually need oil to lubricate parts, or drive the parts to and fro and are good for the environment. But 1484 people is 0.02968% of Albertans. Claiming the options of less than one tenth of a percentage represents the population is absurd.

    Reply
    • Mitchell Beer says:
      3 months ago

      Thanks, Waldo. As an FYI, short of the occasional national census, opinion polls on all issues (and from all sides of the spectrum) are based on the same kind of methodology. One part of responsibly reporting them is to be clear about the methods used.

      Reply
  2. Alfredo Louro says:
    3 months ago

    You’d be surprised. The sample size is perfectly appropriate. The key is that the demographics of the sam0le is representative of the population.
    Nobody is going to pay for a poll that provides no information.
    The fact is that the UCP does not represent the interests of the population, but of the oil and gas shareholders. Who by the way are mostly not Canadian, never mind Albertan.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Related Articles

Olympic Athletes Launch Second Campaign to Ban Future Fossil Sponsorship

Olympic Athletes Launch Second Campaign to Ban Future Fossil Sponsorship

February 11, 2026
Phantom Public Comments Threaten Ohio Solar Farm

Phantom Public Comments Threaten Ohio Solar Farm

February 10, 2026
Washington Post Scales Back Climate Team as Bezos Caves to Trump

Washington Post Scales Back Climate Team as Bezos Caves to Trump

February 5, 2026

Trending Stories

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith and Minister of Technology and Innovation Nate Glubish introduced, at a news conference in Edmonton on December 4, 2024, the province’s new data strategy. (photography by Chris Schwarz/Government of Alberta)

Smith Tells Albertans to ‘Lock In’ Power Prices Before Meta Data Centre Joins Grid

September 1, 2026
36.1k
Jay Phagan/flickr

West Coast Pipeline Won’t Recoup Its $43.7B Cost as Global Oil Demand Weakens

September 2, 2026
1.7k
@5thAdmiralFrank
/Twitter

‘Call to Apathy, Not to Arms’ as UN Warns Climate Overshoot Is Inevitable, Downplays Fossil Phaseout

September 3, 2026
345

The Better Ideas Show: How the Clean Climate Economy Protects Canada’s Sovereignty

by Mitchell Beer
August 30, 2026

…

Follow Us

Copyright 2026 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Buildings & Infrastructure
    • Climate Equity & Justice
      • Energy Poverty
      • Indigenous Rights & Reconciliation
    • Climate Finance
      • Community Climate Finance
      • Finance & Investment
      • Insurance & Liability
      • Subsidies
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought & Wildfires
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Emissions
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Methane
    • Energy
      • Renewables
      • Fossil Fuels
      • Hydrogen
      • Nuclear
      • Batteries & Storage
      • Energy Efficiency
      • Power Grids
    • Food & Agriculture
    • Industry
      • Data Centres & Tech
      • Critical Minerals & Mining
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Policy & Politics
      • Carbon Pricing
      • COP Conferences
      • Elections
      • Energy Politics
      • International Security & War
      • Legal & Regulatory
    • Research & Innovation
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Research & Development
    • Society & Culture
      • Climate Action
      • Mis/Disinformation & Greenwashing
      • Jobs & Training
      • Leisure & Recreation
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Transportation & Mobility
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Shipping & Aviation
      • Transit
      • Walking, Biking & Micromobility
  • Regions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Canada
    • International
    • Mexico & the Caribbean
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Subnational
    • United States
    • UK & Europe
  • Special Coverage
    • The Weekender
    • IEA2026
    • Canada’s Major Projects Office
    • Hidden Wonder Valley
    • COP30
    • Cities & Communities
    • Heat & Power
    • Community Climate Finance
  • More Resources
    • Climate Glossary
    • What If We Changed the Conversation on Climate Change?
    • Eco-Anxiety
  • About
  • Contact

Copyright 2025 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
No Result
View All Result
  • Topics
    • Buildings & Infrastructure
    • Climate Equity & Justice
      • Energy Poverty
      • Indigenous Rights & Reconciliation
    • Climate Finance
      • Community Climate Finance
      • Finance & Investment
      • Insurance & Liability
      • Subsidies
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought & Wildfires
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Emissions
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Methane
    • Energy
      • Renewables
      • Fossil Fuels
      • Hydrogen
      • Nuclear
      • Batteries & Storage
      • Energy Efficiency
      • Power Grids
    • Food & Agriculture
    • Industry
      • Data Centres & Tech
      • Critical Minerals & Mining
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Policy & Politics
      • Carbon Pricing
      • COP Conferences
      • Elections
      • Energy Politics
      • International Security & War
      • Legal & Regulatory
    • Research & Innovation
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Research & Development
    • Society & Culture
      • Climate Action
      • Mis/Disinformation & Greenwashing
      • Jobs & Training
      • Leisure & Recreation
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Transportation & Mobility
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Shipping & Aviation
      • Transit
      • Walking, Biking & Micromobility
  • Regions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Canada
    • International
    • Mexico & the Caribbean
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Subnational
    • United States
    • UK & Europe
  • Special Coverage
    • The Weekender
    • IEA2026
    • Canada’s Major Projects Office
    • Hidden Wonder Valley
    • COP30
    • Cities & Communities
    • Heat & Power
    • Community Climate Finance
  • More Resources
    • Climate Glossary
    • What If We Changed the Conversation on Climate Change?
    • Eco-Anxiety
  • About
  • Contact

Copyright 2025 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.